These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

388 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29417719)

  • 41. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Divergence of a speciation trait through artificial selection: Insights into constraints, by-product effects and sexual isolation.
    Yukilevich R; LaGraff JT
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Feb; 36(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 36576691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The role of model female quality in the mate choice copying behaviour of sailfin mollies.
    Hill SE; Ryan MJ
    Biol Lett; 2006 Jun; 2(2):203-5. PubMed ID: 17148362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Role of sexual imprinting in assortative mating and premating isolation in Darwin's finches.
    Grant PR; Grant BR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Nov; 115(46):E10879-E10887. PubMed ID: 30348758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Sex differences in developmental plasticity and canalization shape population divergence in mate preferences.
    Svensson EI; Runemark A; Verzijden MN; Wellenreuther M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25377451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Adaptive speciation when assortative mating is based on female preference for male marker traits.
    Doebeli M
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Nov; 18(6):1587-600. PubMed ID: 16313470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Factors influencing progress toward sympatric speciation.
    Thibert-Plante X; Hendry AP
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Oct; 24(10):2186-96. PubMed ID: 21707817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Speciation is not necessarily easier in species with sexually monomorphic mating signals.
    Noh S; Henry CS
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Nov; 28(11):1925-39. PubMed ID: 26230311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Gentlemen prefer blondes: the evolution of mate preference among strategically allocated males.
    Rowell JT; Servedio MR
    Am Nat; 2009 Jan; 173(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 19063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Community composition affects the shape of mate response functions.
    Symes LB
    Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2005-13. PubMed ID: 24689891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Conformity in mate choice, the overlooked social component of animal and human culture.
    Nöbel S; Jacquet A; Isabel G; Pocheville A; Seabright P; Danchin E
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2023 Feb; 98(1):132-149. PubMed ID: 36173001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Learning to speciate: The biased learning of mate preferences promotes adaptive radiation.
    Gilman RT; Kozak GM
    Evolution; 2015 Nov; 69(11):3004-12. PubMed ID: 26459795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. QTL analysis of a rapidly evolving speciation phenotype in the Hawaiian cricket Laupala.
    Shaw KL; Parsons YM; Lesnick SC
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Jul; 16(14):2879-92. PubMed ID: 17614904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Behavioural isolation may facilitate homoploid hybrid speciation in cichlid fish.
    Selz OM; Thommen R; Maan ME; Seehausen O
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Feb; 27(2):275-89. PubMed ID: 24372872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Does character displacement initiate speciation? Evidence of reduced gene flow between populations experiencing divergent selection.
    Rice AM; Pfennig DW
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Apr; 23(4):854-65. PubMed ID: 20210828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sexual selection and assortative mating: an experimental test.
    Debelle A; Ritchie MG; Snook RR
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jul; 29(7):1307-16. PubMed ID: 26970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evolution of mate-choice copying: a dynamic model.
    StÖhr S
    Anim Behav; 1998 Apr; 55(4):893-903. PubMed ID: 9632476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Females alter their mate preferences depending on hybridization risk.
    Calabrese GM; Pfennig KS
    Biol Lett; 2022 Nov; 18(11):20220310. PubMed ID: 36382373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speciation by sexual selection: 20 years of progress.
    Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 36(12):1153-1163. PubMed ID: 34607719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.