These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29419354)

  • 21. Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men's decisions in ultimatum games.
    Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Aug; 273(1597):2091-5. PubMed ID: 16846918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pro-inflammatory cytokine predicts reduced rejection of unfair financial offers.
    Ohira H; Osumi T; Matsunaga M; Yamakawa K
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2013; 34(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23524623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sex and the money--How gender stereotypes modulate economic decision-making: An ERP study.
    Fabre EF; Causse M; Pesciarelli F; Cacciari C
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():221-32. PubMed ID: 26102185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human responses to unfairness with primary rewards and their biological limits.
    Wright ND; Hodgson K; Fleming SM; Symmonds M; Guitart-Masip M; Dolan RJ
    Sci Rep; 2012; 2():593. PubMed ID: 22919460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    Sanfey AG; Rilling JK; Aronson JA; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Science; 2003 Jun; 300(5626):1755-8. PubMed ID: 12805551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task.
    Civai C; Corradi-Dell'Acqua C; Gamer M; Rumiati RI
    Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 19786275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Heartbeat and economic decisions: observing mental stress among proposers and responders in the ultimatum bargaining game.
    Dulleck U; Schaffner M; Torgler B
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108218. PubMed ID: 25247817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: evidence from the Ultimatum Game.
    Koenigs M; Tranel D
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(4):951-6. PubMed ID: 17251437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining.
    Boksem MA; De Cremer D
    Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 19851940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Being the chosen one: social inclusion modulates decisions in the ultimatum game. An ERP study.
    Falco A; Albinet C; Rattat AC; Paul I; Fabre E
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 14(2):141-149. PubMed ID: 30608613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Regulating emotion in the context of interpersonal decisions: the role of anticipated pride and regret.
    van der Schalk J; Bruder M; Manstead A
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():513. PubMed ID: 23293615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex.
    Knoch D; Pascual-Leone A; Meyer K; Treyer V; Fehr E
    Science; 2006 Nov; 314(5800):829-32. PubMed ID: 17023614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of self-esteem on social interactions during the Ultimatum Game.
    Paz V; Nicolaisen-Sobesky E; Collado E; Horta S; Rey C; Rivero M; Berriolo P; Díaz M; Otón M; Pérez A; Fernández-Theoduloz G; Cabana Á; Gradin VB
    Psychiatry Res; 2017 Jun; 252():247-255. PubMed ID: 28285253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Affective state and decision-making in the Ultimatum Game.
    van 't Wout M; Kahn RS; Sanfey AG; Aleman A
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(4):564-8. PubMed ID: 16489438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anterior insula signals inequalities in a modified Ultimatum Game.
    Cheng X; Zheng L; Li L; Zheng Y; Guo X; Yang G
    Neuroscience; 2017 Apr; 348():126-134. PubMed ID: 28223239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Negative incidental emotions augment fairness sensitivity.
    Liu C; Chai JW; Yu R
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24892. PubMed ID: 27101931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence of general economic principles of bargaining and trade from 2,000 classroom experiments.
    Lin PH; Brown AL; Imai T; Wang JT; Wang SW; Camerer CF
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Sep; 4(9):917-927. PubMed ID: 32747803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The ultimatum bargaining game: An adaptation for teaching ethics.
    Bertolami CN; Opazo C; Janal MN
    J Dent Educ; 2022 Apr; 86(4):437-442. PubMed ID: 34726272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Disgust selectively modulates reciprocal fairness in economic interactions.
    Moretti L; di Pellegrino G
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 20364893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.