These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29419356)

  • 1. Developmental differences in approaches to nonsymbolic comparison tasks.
    Clayton S; Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):436-445. PubMed ID: 29419356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number.
    Mundy E; Gilmore CK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Aug; 103(4):490-502. PubMed ID: 19327782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties.
    Gebuis T; Reynvoet B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Nov; 141(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 22082115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of brain systems for nonsymbolic numerosity and the relationship to formal math academic achievement.
    Haist F; Wazny JH; Toomarian E; Adamo M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):804-26. PubMed ID: 25327879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The contributions of numerical acuity and non-numerical stimulus features to the development of the number sense and symbolic math achievement.
    Starr A; DeWind NK; Brannon EM
    Cognition; 2017 Nov; 168():222-233. PubMed ID: 28715669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Varieties of quantity estimation in children.
    Sella F; Berteletti I; Lucangeli D; Zorzi M
    Dev Psychol; 2015 Jun; 51(6):758-70. PubMed ID: 26010388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sampling from the mental number line: how are approximate number system representations formed?
    Inglis M; Gilmore C
    Cognition; 2013 Oct; 129(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 23831565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A two-minute paper-and-pencil test of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing explains variability in primary school children's arithmetic competence.
    Nosworthy N; Bugden S; Archibald L; Evans B; Ansari D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(7):e67918. PubMed ID: 23844126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of visual-spatial skills on the association between processing of nonsymbolic numerical magnitude and number word sequence skills.
    Lonnemann J; Müller C; Büttner G; Hasselhorn M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Feb; 178():184-197. PubMed ID: 30388483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults.
    Price GR; Palmer D; Battista C; Ansari D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 22445770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluency in symbolic arithmetic refines the approximate number system in parietal cortex.
    Suárez-Pellicioni M; Booth JR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Oct; 39(10):3956-3971. PubMed ID: 30024084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intergenerational associations of the approximate number system in toddlers and their parents.
    Navarro MG; Braham EJ; Libertus ME
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2018 Nov; 36(4):521-539. PubMed ID: 29377230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dot comparison stimuli are not all alike: the effect of different visual controls on ANS measurement.
    Clayton S; Gilmore C; Inglis M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():177-84. PubMed ID: 26408864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The measurement of approximate number system acuity across the lifespan is compromised by congruency effects.
    Norris JE; Clayton S; Gilmore C; Inglis M; Castronovo J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1037-1046. PubMed ID: 29747553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to estimate how well people estimate: evaluating measures of individual differences in the approximate number system.
    Chesney D; Bjalkebring P; Peters E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2781-802. PubMed ID: 26335207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task- and age-dependent effects of visual stimulus properties on children's explicit numerosity judgments.
    Defever E; Reynvoet B; Gebuis T
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 23860419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners.
    Sasanguie D; Defever E; Maertens B; Reynvoet B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Feb; 67(2):271-80. PubMed ID: 23767979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Working memory in nonsymbolic approximate arithmetic processing: a dual-task study with preschoolers.
    Xenidou-Dervou I; van Lieshout EC; van der Schoot M
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):101-27. PubMed ID: 23855416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability and Validity of Nonsymbolic and Symbolic Comparison Tasks in School-Aged Children.
    Castro D; Estévez N; Gómez D; Dartnell PR
    Span J Psychol; 2017 Dec; 20():E75. PubMed ID: 29199626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sharpening, focusing, and developing: A study of change in nonsymbolic number comparison skills and math achievement in 1st grade.
    Wilkey ED; Shanley L; Sabb F; Ansari D; Cohen JC; Men V; Heller NA; Clarke B
    Dev Sci; 2022 May; 25(3):e13194. PubMed ID: 34800342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.