These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial. Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S; JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Karram M; Goldwasser S; Kleeman S; Steele A; Vassallo B; Walsh P Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 185(6):1339-42; discussion 1342-3. PubMed ID: 11744906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Rahn DD; Richter HE; Sung VW; Pruszynski JE; Hynan LS JAMA; 2023 Aug; 330(7):615-625. PubMed ID: 37581673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D; JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surgical options for the management of anterior and/or posterior vaginal wall prolapse: two randomised controlled trials within a comprehensive cohort study - results from the PROSPECT Study. Glazener C; Breeman S; Elders A; Hemming C; Cooper K; Freeman R; Smith A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; McDonald A; McPherson G; MacLennan G; Norrie J Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(95):1-452. PubMed ID: 28052810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect]. Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Preoperative POPQ versus Simulated Apical Support as a Guideline for Anterior or Posterior Repair at the Time of Transvaginal Apical Suspension (PREPARE trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Jeon MJ; Kim CH; Cho HH; Suh DH; Kim SR BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e034170. PubMed ID: 31911524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension]. Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced uterovaginal prolapse: is vaginal hysterectomy with McCall culdoplasty as effective as in lesser degrees of prolapse? Alas A; Chandrasekaran N; Devakumar H; Martin L; Hurtado E; Davila GW Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 28779416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]