BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29420515)

  • 1. [Preprints in biomedicine: alternative or complement to the traditional model of publication?].
    Aquino-Jarquin G; Valencia-Reyes JM; Silva-Carmona A; Granados-Riverón JT
    Gac Med Mex; 2018; 154(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 29420515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Has the time come for preprints in biology?
    Bhalla N
    Mol Biol Cell; 2016 Apr; 27(8):1185-7. PubMed ID: 27079652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Plan U: Universal access to scientific and medical research via funder preprint mandates.
    Sever R; Eisen M; Inglis J
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000273. PubMed ID: 31163026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process.
    Hoy MB
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2020; 39(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 32069196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Priority of discovery in the life sciences.
    Vale RD; Hyman AA
    Elife; 2016 Jun; 5():. PubMed ID: 27310529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.
    Kovanis M; Porcher R; Ravaud P; Trinquart L
    Scientometrics; 2016; 106():695-715. PubMed ID: 26855456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fate of rejected manuscripts in the journal Medicina Intensiva during 2015-2017 period.
    García-Garmendia JL; Gordo-Vidal F; Leal-Noval SR; Amaya-Villar R; Raimondi N; Ochagavía-Calvo A; Garnacho-Montero J
    Med Intensiva (Engl Ed); 2021; 45(5):271-279. PubMed ID: 34059217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Submission of scientifically sound and ethical manuscripts to peer-reviewed journals - a reviewer's personal perspective on bioanalytical publications.
    Weng N
    Biomed Chromatogr; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1457-60. PubMed ID: 22987619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acceptance rates for manuscripts submitted to veterinary peer-reviewed journals in 2012.
    Lamb CR; Adams CA
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Nov; 47(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 25302854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.
    Jones AW
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(2-3):115-28. PubMed ID: 16784827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.
    Sarabipour S; Debat HJ; Emmott E; Burgess SJ; Schwessinger B; Hensel Z
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Feb; 17(2):e3000151. PubMed ID: 30789895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The new peer review.
    Kohane IS; Altman RB
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():433-7. PubMed ID: 11079920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Problems with traditional science publishing and finding a wider niche for post-publication peer review.
    Teixeira da Silva JA; Dobránszki J
    Account Res; 2015; 22(1):22-40. PubMed ID: 25275622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. International authorship and collaboration across bioRxiv preprints.
    Abdill RJ; Adamowicz EM; Blekhman R
    Elife; 2020 Jul; 9():. PubMed ID: 32716295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War.
    Polenakovic M; Danevska L
    Prilozi; 2011; 32(2):11-31. PubMed ID: 22286612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publishing of COVID-19 preprints in peer-reviewed journals, preprinting trends, public discussion and quality issues.
    Kodvanj I; Homolak J; Virag D; Trkulja V
    Scientometrics; 2022; 127(3):1339-1352. PubMed ID: 35125557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review practices in biomedical literature: a time for change?
    Mahawar KK; Kejariwal D; Malviya A; Birla R; Viswanath YK
    Asian J Surg; 2009 Oct; 32(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 19892628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature.
    Carneiro CFD; Queiroz VGS; Moulin TC; Carvalho CAM; Haas CB; Rayêe D; Henshall DE; De-Souza EA; Amorim FE; Boos FZ; Guercio GD; Costa IR; Hajdu KL; van Egmond L; Modrák M; Tan PB; Abdill RJ; Burgess SJ; Guerra SFS; Bortoluzzi VT; Amaral OB
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020 Dec; 5(1):16. PubMed ID: 33292815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fate of manuscripts declined by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
    Armstrong AW; Idriss SZ; Kimball AB; Bernhard JD
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Apr; 58(4):632-5. PubMed ID: 18249470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.