These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29421003)

  • 21. Radiation dose absorbed by operators during transradial percutaneous coronary procedures comparing different protective drapes: the RADIATION study.
    Sciahbasi A; Rigattieri S; Sarandrea A; Cera M; Di Russo C; Fedele S; Romano S; Pugliese FR; Penco M
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Apr; 12(18):e2253-e2261. PubMed ID: 28044985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study.
    Dominici M; Diletti R; Milici C; Bock C; Placanica A; D'Alessandro G; Arrivi A; Italiani M; Buono E; Boschetti E
    Heart; 2013 Apr; 99(7):480-4. PubMed ID: 23343690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention is associated with lower patient radiation exposure in high-radial-volume centres: Insights from the RAY'ACT-1 study.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Meunier L; Dechery T; Khalifé K; Pecheux M; Elhaddad S; Amabile N; Pansieri M; Ballout J; Marchand X; Rouault G; Leddet P; Nugue O; Lucke N; Cattan S;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Mar; 110(3):179-187. PubMed ID: 28117244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reduction in operator radiation exposure during transradial catheterization and intervention using a simple lead drape.
    Iqtidar AF; Jeon C; Rothman R; Snead R; Pyne CT
    Am Heart J; 2013 Mar; 165(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 23453095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Decreasing operators' radiation exposure during coronary procedures: the transradial radiation protection board.
    Behan M; Haworth P; Colley P; Brittain M; Hince A; Clarke M; Ghuran A; Saha M; Hildick-Smith D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jul; 76(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 20578091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comprehensive radiation shield minimizes operator radiation exposure in coronary and structural heart procedures.
    Rizik DG; Gosselin KP; Burke RF; Goldstein JA
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2024 Jul; 64():70-75. PubMed ID: 38538447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Operator radiation exposure and physical discomfort during a right versus left radial approach for coronary interventions: a randomized evaluation.
    Kado H; Patel AM; Suryadevara S; Zenni MM; Box LC; Angiolillo DJ; Bass TA; Guzman LA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):810-6. PubMed ID: 24954573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study.
    Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of Vascular Access Site Choice on Radiation Exposure During Coronary Angiography: The REVERE Trial (Randomized Evaluation of Vascular Entry Site and Radiation Exposure).
    Pancholy SB; Joshi P; Shah S; Rao SV; Bertrand OF; Patel TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1189-1196. PubMed ID: 26210808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Image noise reduction technology reduces radiation in a radial-first cardiac catheterization laboratory.
    Gunja A; Pandey Y; Xie H; Wolska BM; Shroff AR; Ardati AK; Vidovich MI
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 28089778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy of MAVIG X-Ray Protective Drapes in Reducing Operator Radiation Dose in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    McCutcheon K; Vanhaverbeke M; Pauwels R; Dabin J; Schoonjans W; Bennett J; Adriaenssens T; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Desmet W
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009627. PubMed ID: 33092401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Staff radiation dose during percutaneous coronary procedures: Role of adjunctive protective drapes.
    Sciahbasi A; Sarandrea A; Rigattieri S; Patrizi R; Cera M; Di Russo C; Perone F; Porretta V; Fedele S; Romano S; Penco M; Ferraiuolo G
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Oct; 19(7 Pt A):755-758. PubMed ID: 29691182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. IMPACT OF PELVIC AND RAD-BOARD LEAD SHIELDS ON OPERATOR AND PATIENT RADIATION DOSE IN TRANS-RADIAL CORONARY PROCEDURES.
    Khaleghi Fard A; Alian AHM; Pourafkari L; Ghojazadeh M; Tarighatnia A; Farajollahi A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):108-114. PubMed ID: 31135929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The addition of a leaded arm sleeve to leaded aprons further decreases operator upper outer quadrant chest wall radiation dose during fluoroscopically guided interventions.
    Ramanan B; Pizano A; Solano A; Gonugunta AS; Timaran CH; Siah M; Baig S; Shih M; Guild JB; Kirkwood ML
    J Vasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 79(4):948-953. PubMed ID: 38040201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Madder RD; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Elmore M; Campbell J; Borgman A; Parker J; Wohns D
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(3):190-196. PubMed ID: 28041859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reduced radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory with a novel vertical radiation shield.
    Panetta CJ; Galbraith EM; Yanavitski M; Koller PK; Shah B; Iqbal S; Cigarroa JE; Gordon G; Rao SV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 31793752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Operator radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary procedures through the left or right radial approach: the TALENT dosimetric substudy.
    Sciahbasi A; Romagnoli E; Trani C; Burzotta F; Sarandrea A; Summaria F; Patrizi R; Rao S; Lioy E
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jun; 4(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 21586692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of patient obesity on radiation doses received by scrub technologists during coronary angiography.
    Refahiyat L; VanOosterhout S; Mulder A; Ten Brock T; Parker JL; Negash A; Jacoby ME; Madder RD
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Dec; 19(8):929-933. PubMed ID: 30077495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiation safety and vascular access: attitudes among cardiologists worldwide.
    Vidovich MI; Khan AA; Xie H; Shroff AR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25669957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.