1526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29421641)
1. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.
Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S
Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review to examine the evidence regarding discussions by midwives, with women, around their options for where to give birth.
Henshall C; Taylor B; Kenyon S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Mar; 16():53. PubMed ID: 26975299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Midwives' experiences of referring obese women to either a community or home-based antenatal weight management service: Implications for service providers and midwifery practice.
Atkinson L; French DP; Ménage D; Olander EK
Midwifery; 2017 Jun; 49():102-109. PubMed ID: 27817977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing possibilities - Increasing dilemmas: A qualitative study of Swedish midwives' experiences of ultrasound use in pregnancy.
Edvardsson K; Lalos A; Åhman A; Small R; Graner Md PhD S; Mogren I
Midwifery; 2016 Nov; 42():46-53. PubMed ID: 27788415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictors of midwives' intention to provide planned home birth services to low-risk women: A theory of planned behaviour approach.
Muhammed A; Khuan L; Shariff-Ghazali S; Said SM; Hassan M
Midwifery; 2019 Jun; 73():62-68. PubMed ID: 30884373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task shifting Midwifery Support Workers as the second health worker at a home birth in the UK: A qualitative study.
Taylor B; Henshall C; Goodwin L; Kenyon S
Midwifery; 2018 Jul; 62():109-115. PubMed ID: 29665522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring midwives' interactions with mothers when labour begins: A study using participatory action research.
Shallow HED; Deery R; Kirkham M
Midwifery; 2018 Mar; 58():64-70. PubMed ID: 29306098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J
Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.
Nicholls S; Hauck YL; Bayes S; Butt J
Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():73-81. PubMed ID: 26549568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Midwives' attitudes towards supporting normal labour and birth - A cross-sectional study in South Germany.
Zinsser LA; Stoll K; Gross MM
Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():98-102. PubMed ID: 27321726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementing the MAMAACT intervention in Danish antenatal care: a qualitative study of non-Western immigrant women's and midwives' attitudes and experiences.
Johnsen H; Christensen U; Juhl M; Villadsen SF
Midwifery; 2021 Apr; 95():102935. PubMed ID: 33556845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing and evaluating an online learning tool to improve midwives' accuracy of visual estimation of blood loss during waterbirth: An experimental study.
Burns E; Hunter L; Rodd Z; MacLeod M; Smith L
Midwifery; 2019 Jan; 68():65-73. PubMed ID: 30368119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing midwifery practice through work-based learning: an exploratory study.
Marshall JE
Nurse Educ Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 22749493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study.
Lohmann S; Mattern E; Ayerle GM
Midwifery; 2018 Jun; 61():53-62. PubMed ID: 29529579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Midwives perspectives of their training and education requirements in maternal obesity: a qualitative study.
Heslehurst N; Russell S; McCormack S; Sedgewick G; Bell R; Rankin J
Midwifery; 2013 Jul; 29(7):736-44. PubMed ID: 22951422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Providing quality care for women with vasa praevia: Challenges and barriers faced by Australian midwives.
Javid N; Hyett JA; Homer CS
Midwifery; 2019 Jan; 68():91-98. PubMed ID: 30396003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effectiveness of a Chinese midwives' antenatal clinic service on childbirth outcomes for primipare: a randomised controlled trial.
Gu C; Wu X; Ding Y; Zhu X; Zhang Z
Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Dec; 50(12):1689-97. PubMed ID: 23735597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A qualitative study of midwives' perceptions on using video-calling in early labor.
Spiby H; Faucher MA; Sands G; Roberts J; Kennedy HP
Birth; 2019 Mar; 46(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 29901231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
