229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29422172)
1. Are you also overwhelmed by the predators?
Fitzpatrick JJ
Appl Nurs Res; 2018 Feb; 39():270. PubMed ID: 29422172
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. JMT's Research Concepts Section: a 5-Year Evaluation.
Jang DH; Love JS; Mycyk MB
J Med Toxicol; 2019 Oct; 15(4):226-227. PubMed ID: 31385195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical research design and reporting: always room for improvement!
Heddle NM; Ness P
Transfusion; 2007 Jan; 47(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 17207221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial Decision Making for Academic Medicine, 2021.
Roberts LW; Coverdale J
Acad Med; 2021 Jan; 96(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 33394645
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ghost busting--taking the sheet off the ghost.
Moots RJ; Wilson K; Silverman ED
Z Rheumatol; 2016 Apr; 75(3):240-1. PubMed ID: 27038049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Data presentation and the use of statistical tests in biomedical journals: can we reach a consensus?
Evans RG; Su DF
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 2011 May; 38(5):285-6. PubMed ID: 21388434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Scientific publications: the Ocorrafoo Cobange symptom].
Nau JY
Rev Med Suisse; 2013 Oct; 9(402):1924-5. PubMed ID: 24298719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The end of scientific articles as we know them?
West R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():276. PubMed ID: 26163126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A concern that drug companies cannot ignore.
Wager E
J R Soc Med; 2005 Oct; 98(10):448-50. PubMed ID: 16199811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
Barreiro E
Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Good publishing practice.
Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 65(4):353-4. PubMed ID: 22360986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Salami slicing.
Gray R; Baker C
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2016 Nov; 23(9-10):541-542. PubMed ID: 27620457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Open season: positive changes for increased transparency in the biomedical literature.
Jones PM; Bryson GL
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Mar; 65(3):246-253. PubMed ID: 29164529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. What a reviewer wants?
Khetan V; Sengupta S
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 65(8):656-657. PubMed ID: 28820149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Here/In this issue and there/abstract thinking: how do we know what we know? Cautionary tales in medical publishing.
Sassi RB
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2014 Jan; 53(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24342378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Which evidence will you act on?
Haddad FS
Bone Joint J; 2019 May; 101-B(5):497-499. PubMed ID: 31038359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting guidelines for realist evaluations seek to improve clarity and transparency.
Welch VA; Tricco AC
BMC Med; 2016 Jul; 14(1):109. PubMed ID: 27443561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peer review should continue after publication.
Liesegang TJ
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Dealing with predatory publishing is a shared responsibility: the role of Latin American journals.
Memon AR
An Acad Bras Cienc; 2019 Nov; 91(4):e20180631. PubMed ID: 31721916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
