971 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29422207)
1. A new customized fetal growth standard for African American women: the PRB/NICHD Detroit study.
Tarca AL; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Erez O; Hernandez-Andrade E; Yeo L; Bhatti G; Pacora P; Maymon E; Hassan SS
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S679-S691.e4. PubMed ID: 29422207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
Kabiri D; Romero R; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Pacora P; Benshalom-Tirosh N; Tirosh D; Yeo L; Erez O; Hassan SS; Tarca AL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing the Hadlock fetal growth standard to the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development racial/ethnic standard for the prediction of neonatal morbidity and small for gestational age.
Blue NR; Beddow ME; Savabi M; Katukuri VR; Chao CR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 30118689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduced fetal growth velocity precedes antepartum fetal death.
Pacora P; Romero R; Jung E; Gudicha DW; Hernandez-Andrade E; Musilova I; Kacerovsky M; Jaiman S; Erez O; Hsu CD; Tarca AL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 57(6):942-952. PubMed ID: 32936481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Tarca AL; Hernandez-Andrade E; Ahn H; Garcia M; Xu Z; Korzeniewski SJ; Saker H; Chaiworapongsa T; Hassan SS; Yeo L; Romero R
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Greater estimated fetal weight and birth weight in IVF/ICSI pregnancy after frozen-thawed vs fresh blastocyst transfer: prospective cohort study with novel unified modeling methodology.
Cavoretto PI; Farina A; Gaeta G; Seidenari A; Pozzoni M; Spinillo S; Morano D; Alteri A; Viganò P; Candiani M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 60(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 34716733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
Grantz KL; Hediger ML; Liu D; Buck Louis GM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S641-S655.e28. PubMed ID: 29275821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.
Kiserud T; Benachi A; Hecher K; Perez RG; Carvalho J; Piaggio G; Platt LD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S619-S629. PubMed ID: 29422204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38151220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced growth velocity from the mid-trimester is associated with placental insufficiency in fetuses born at a normal birthweight.
Kennedy LM; Tong S; Robinson AJ; Hiscock RJ; Hui L; Dane KM; Middleton AL; Walker SP; MacDonald TM
BMC Med; 2020 Dec; 18(1):395. PubMed ID: 33357243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal risk assessment of small-for-gestational-age fetuses using 31-34-week biometry in a low-risk population.
Stirnemann JJ; Benoist G; Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 43(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 24357451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age infant by fetal growth charts and hemoglobin A1c level in pregnancy complicated by pregestational diabetes.
Kiefer MK; Finneran MM; Ware CA; Foy P; Thung SF; Gabbe SG; Landon MB; Grobman WA; Venkatesh KK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Dec; 60(6):751-758. PubMed ID: 36099480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women.
Martín-Palumbo G; Atanasova VB; Rego Tejeda MT; Antolín Alvarado E; Bartha JL
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):6721-6726. PubMed ID: 34024243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics associated with antenatally unidentified small-for-gestational-age fetuses: prospective cohort study nested within DESiGN randomized controlled trial.
Relph S; Vieira MC; Copas A; Alagna A; Page L; Winsloe C; Shennan A; Briley A; Johnson M; Lees C; Lawlor DA; Sandall J; Khalil A; Pasupathy D;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 61(3):356-366. PubMed ID: 36206546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age as predictors of neonatal morbidity: which growth nomogram to use?
Leon-Martinez D; Lundsberg LS; Culhane J; Zhang J; Son M; Reddy UM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 229(6):678.e1-678.e16. PubMed ID: 37348779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second and third trimester fetal ultrasound population screening for risks of preterm birth and small-size and large-size for gestational age at birth: a population-based prospective cohort study.
Erkamp JS; Voerman E; Steegers EAP; Mulders AGMGJ; Reiss IKM; Duijts L; Jaddoe VWV; Gaillard R
BMC Med; 2020 Apr; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 32252740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
