These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29422940)

  • 1. Strength-based assessment for future violence risk: a retrospective validation study of the Structured Assessment of PROtective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF) Japanese version in forensic psychiatric inpatients.
    Kashiwagi H; Kikuchi A; Koyama M; Saito D; Hirabayashi N
    Ann Gen Psychiatry; 2018; 17():5. PubMed ID: 29422940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services.
    Abidin Z; Davoren M; Naughton L; Gibbons O; Nulty A; Kennedy HG
    BMC Psychiatry; 2013 Jul; 13():197. PubMed ID: 23890106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF.
    de Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Koster K; Bogaerts S
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 25210106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing protective factors to prevent post-discharge violent behaviour: Towards an assets-based approach for clinical risk management.
    Doyle M; Coid J; Ullrich S; Shaw J
    J Psychiatr Res; 2021 Nov; 143():416-421. PubMed ID: 34655951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for violence risk (SAPROF): A meta-analysis of its predictive and incremental validity.
    Burghart M; de Ruiter C; Hynes SE; Krishnan N; Levtova Y; Uyar A
    Psychol Assess; 2023 Jan; 35(1):56-67. PubMed ID: 36227302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk and protective factors in risk assessment: Predicting inpatient aggression in adult males detained in a forensic mental health setting.
    Ireland JL; Levtova Y; Abi Semaan CM; Steene LMB; Henrich S; Gaylor L; Driemel L; Volz S; Homann J; Dickopf M; Greenwood L; Chu S
    Aggress Behav; 2024 May; 50(3):e22150. PubMed ID: 38764372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Protective Factors for Violence Risk in U.K. General Mental Health Services Using the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors.
    Haines A; Brown A; Javaid SF; Khan F; Noblett S; Omodunbi O; Sadiq K; Zaman W; Whittington R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Sep; 62(12):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 29284378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive accuracy of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 for violence in forensic psychiatric wards in Japan.
    Arai K; Takano A; Nagata T; Hirabayashi N
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2017 Dec; 27(5):409-420. PubMed ID: 27296667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Perspective of Forensic Inpatients With Psychotic Disorders on Protective Factors Against Risk of Violent Behavior.
    Kashiwagi H; Yamada Y; Umegaki Y; Takeda K; Hirabayashi N
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():575529. PubMed ID: 33240128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors Predicting Desistance From Reoffending: A Validation Study of the SAPROF in Sexual Offenders.
    Yoon D; Turner D; Klein V; Rettenberger M; Eher R; Briken P
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2018 Feb; 62(3):697-716. PubMed ID: 27531703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism.
    De Vries Robbé M; de Vogel V; Douglas KS; Nijman HL
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 24933171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Promotive, Mixed, and Risk Effects of Individual Items Comprising the SAPROF Assessment Tool With Justice-Involved Youth.
    Langton CM; Betteridge M; Worling JR
    Assessment; 2024 Mar; 31(2):418-430. PubMed ID: 37038332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic violence risk, protective factors, and therapeutic change in a gender and ethnoculturally diverse sample of court-adjudicated youth.
    Lovatt KM; Stockdale KC; Olver ME
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Feb; 34(2):105-124. PubMed ID: 34460284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identifying Causal Risk Factors for Violence among Discharged Patients.
    Coid JW; Kallis C; Doyle M; Shaw J; Ullrich S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142493. PubMed ID: 26554711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of the Historical, Clinical and Risk Management Scales (HCR-20) in predicting violence and other offenses in forensic psychiatric patients in Brazil.
    Telles LE; Folino JO; Taborda JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):427-31. PubMed ID: 23021023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attending to the Positive: A Retrospective Validation of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors-Sexual Offence Version.
    Nolan T; Willis GM; Thornton D; Kelley SM; Christofferson SB
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Mar; 35(2):241-260. PubMed ID: 35507760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the reliability, predictive and construct validity of historical, clinical and risk management-20 (HCR-20) in Mexican psychiatric inpatients.
    Sada A; Robles-García R; Martínez-López N; Hernández-Ramírez R; Tovilla-Zarate CA; López-Munguía F; Suárez-Alvarez E; Ayala X; Fresán A
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2016 Aug; 70(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 27067828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing risk for inpatient physical violence in a female forensic psychiatric sample - comparing HCR-20v2 with the female additional manual to the HCR-20v2.
    Strand SJM; Selenius H
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2019; 73(4-5):248-256. PubMed ID: 31081436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.
    Kleeven ATH; de Vries Robbé M; Mulder EA; Popma A
    Assessment; 2022 Mar; 29(2):181-197. PubMed ID: 32964720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: A 4-year follow-up.
    Gammelgård M; Koivisto AM; Eronen M; Kaltiala-Heino R
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 25042997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.