141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29425102)
1. Designs and performance of three new microprocessor-controlled knee joints.
Thiele J; Schöllig C; Bellmann M; Kraft M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Feb; 64(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 29425102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative biomechanical evaluation of two technologically different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints in safety-relevant daily-life situations.
Bellmann M; Köhler TM; Schmalz T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Aug; 64(4):407-420. PubMed ID: 30540556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative biomechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 91(4):644-52. PubMed ID: 20382300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Designs and performance of microprocessor-controlled knee joints.
Thiele J; Westebbe B; Bellmann M; Kraft M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2014 Feb; 59(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 24176961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of transfemoral amputees using a passive microprocessor-controlled knee versus an active powered microprocessor-controlled knee for level walking.
Creylman V; Knippels I; Janssen P; Biesbrouck E; Lechler K; Peeraer L
Biomed Eng Online; 2016 Dec; 15(Suppl 3):142. PubMed ID: 28105945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The comparison of transfemoral amputees using mechanical and microprocessor- controlled prosthetic knee under different walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Cao W; Yu H; Zhao W; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(4):581-592. PubMed ID: 29710741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in knee flexion between the Genium and C-Leg microprocessor knees while walking on level ground and ramps.
Lura DJ; Wernke MM; Carey SL; Kahle JT; Miro RM; Highsmith MJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 25537443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pilot study of the microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee with a novel hydraulic damper.
Zhang Y; Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(1):93-97. PubMed ID: 31476188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Ludwigs E; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):541-9. PubMed ID: 22373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits of the Genium microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee on ambulation, mobility, activities of daily living and quality of life: a systematic literature review.
Mileusnic MP; Rettinger L; Highsmith MJ; Hahn A
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2021 Jul; 16(5):453-464. PubMed ID: 31469023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee across varying walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Sveinsdóttir HS; Prins MR; van der Meer F; Koopman HFJM; Rietman JS
Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():254-260. PubMed ID: 27838569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanics of ramp descent in unilateral trans-tibial amputees: Comparison of a microprocessor controlled foot with conventional ankle-foot mechanisms.
Struchkov V; Buckley JG
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2016 Feb; 32():164-70. PubMed ID: 26689894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safety and function of a prototype microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis for low active transfemoral amputees switching from a mechanic knee prosthesis: a pilot study.
Hasenoehrl T; Schmalz T; Windhager R; Domayer S; Dana S; Ambrozy C; Palma S; Crevenna R
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2018 Feb; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 28399722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A functional comparison of conventional knee-ankle-foot orthoses and a microprocessor-controlled leg orthosis system based on biomechanical parameters.
Schmalz T; Pröbsting E; Auberger R; Siewert G
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Apr; 40(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 25249381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Functional added value of microprocessor-controlled knee joints in daily life performance of Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 amputees.
Theeven P; Hemmen B; Rings F; Meys G; Brink P; Smeets R; Seelen H
J Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 43(10):906-15. PubMed ID: 21947182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transitioning to a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee: Executive functioning during single and dual-task gait.
Ramstrand N; Rusaw DF; Möller SF
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 31826702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Biomechanics and evaluation of the microprocessor-controlled C-Leg exoprosthesis knee joint].
Stinus H
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000; 138(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 10929622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The utility of the single-subject method for comparison of temporal-spatial gait changes between a microprocessor and non-microprocessor prosthetic knees.
Howard CL; Wallace C; Perry B; Stokic DS
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Jun; 44(3):133-144. PubMed ID: 32186241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
