BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29425632)

  • 21. Benefits of a physician-facing tablet presentation of patient symptom data: comparing paper and electronic formats.
    Glaser D; Jain S; Kortum P
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2013 Sep; 13():99. PubMed ID: 24004844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Navigation in the electronic health record: A review of the safety and usability literature.
    Roman LC; Ancker JS; Johnson SB; Senathirajah Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Mar; 67():69-79. PubMed ID: 28088527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Usability of a mobile electronic medical record prototype: a verbal protocol analysis.
    Wu RC; Orr MS; Chignell M; Straus SE
    Inform Health Soc Care; 2008 Jun; 33(2):139-49. PubMed ID: 18604757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electronic health record usage behaviors in primary care medical practices: A survey of family physicians in Canada.
    Paré G; Raymond L; Guinea AO; Poba-Nzaou P; Trudel MC; Marsan J; Micheneau T
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):857-67. PubMed ID: 26238705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electronic Health Record Adoption among Obstetrician/Gynecologists in the United States: Physician Practices and Satisfaction.
    Raglan GB; Margolis B; Paulus RA; Schulkin J
    J Healthc Qual; 2017; 39(3):144-152. PubMed ID: 28481842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Developing a mobile epilepsy management application integrated with an electronic health record for effective seizure management.
    Yoo S; Lim K; Baek H; Jang SK; Hwang GY; Kim H; Hwang H
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104051. PubMed ID: 31837500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating change in user error when using ruggedized handheld devices.
    Cannon AB; Strawderman L; Burch R
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Nov; 51():273-80. PubMed ID: 26154226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determining differences in user performance between expert and novice primary care doctors when using an electronic health record (EHR).
    Clarke MA; Belden JL; Kim MS
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 25470668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perspectives and Uses of the Electronic Health Record Among US Pediatricians: A National Survey.
    Doberne JW; Redd T; Lattin D; Yackel TR; Eriksson CO; Mohan V; Gold JA; Ash JS; Chiang MF
    J Ambul Care Manage; 2017; 40(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 27902553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electronic health record innovations: Helping physicians - One less click at a time.
    Guo U; Chen L; Mehta PH
    Health Inf Manag; 2017 Sep; 46(3):140-144. PubMed ID: 28671038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Physicians' gender and their use of electronic health records: findings from a mixed-methods usability study.
    Khairat S; Coleman C; Ottmar P; Bice T; Koppel R; Carson SS
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Dec; 26(12):1505-1514. PubMed ID: 31504578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pharmacy students' preference for using mobile devices in a clinical setting for practice-related tasks.
    Richard CA; Hastings JF; Bryant JE
    Am J Pharm Educ; 2015 Mar; 79(2):22. PubMed ID: 25861103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of EHR-integrated mobile patient questionnaires regarding usability and cost-efficiency.
    Fritz F; Balhorn S; Riek M; Breil B; Dugas M
    Int J Med Inform; 2012 May; 81(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 22236957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Future Mobile Device Usage, Requirements, and Expectations of Physicians in German University Hospitals: Web-Based Survey.
    Maassen O; Fritsch S; Gantner J; Deffge S; Kunze J; Marx G; Bickenbach J
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Dec; 22(12):e23955. PubMed ID: 33346735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Electronic physiologic and subjective data acquisition in home-dwelling heart failure patients: An assessment of patient use and perception of usability.
    Gardner CL; Flanagan MC; Franklin C; John-Swayers C; Walsh-Pouch S; Bryant FJ; Romano CA; Gibbons S; De Jong M; Hoang A; Becher D; Burke HB
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Sep; 93():42-8. PubMed ID: 27435946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Physicians' and nurses' experiences on EHR usability: Comparison between the professional groups by employment sector and system brand.
    Kaipio J; Kuusisto A; Hyppönen H; Heponiemi T; Lääveri T
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Feb; 134():104018. PubMed ID: 31835158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experiences of Electronic Health Records' and Client Information Systems' Use on a Mobile Device and Factors Associated With Work Time Savings Among Practical Nurses: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Paatela S; Kyytsönen M; Saranto K; Kinnunen UM; Vehko T
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e46954. PubMed ID: 38809583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pointing Device Performance in Steering Tasks.
    Senanayake R; Goonetilleke RS
    Percept Mot Skills; 2016 Jun; 122(3):886-910. PubMed ID: 27216944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Usability Evaluation of Electronic Health Record System around Clinical Notes Usage-An Ethnographic Study.
    Rizvi RF; Marquard JL; Hultman GM; Adam TJ; Harder KA; Melton GB
    Appl Clin Inform; 2017 Oct; 8(4):1095-1105. PubMed ID: 29241247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating the usability of speech recognition to create clinical documentation using a commercial electronic health record.
    Hodgson T; Magrabi F; Coiera E
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 May; 113():38-42. PubMed ID: 29602431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.