These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29425837)

  • 1. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: early postoperative outcomes after surgical reduction of enlarged genital hiatus.
    Bradley MS; Askew AL; Vaughan MH; Kawasaki A; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 218(5):514.e1-514.e8. PubMed ID: 29425837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surgical Alteration of Genital Hiatus Size and Anatomic Failure After Vaginal Vault Suspension.
    Vaughan MH; Siddiqui NY; Newcomb LK; Weidner AC; Kawasaki A; Visco AG; Bradley MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 131(6):1137-1144. PubMed ID: 29742664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Genital Hiatus Size on Anatomic Outcomes After Mesh-Augmented Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation.
    Vaughan MH; Giugale LE; Siddiqui NY; Bradley MS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep; 27(9):564-568. PubMed ID: 33411455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical Outcomes of Paravaginal Repair After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Hoke TP; Goldstein H; Saks EK; Vakili B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):892-895. PubMed ID: 29371174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate Postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification Measures and 2-Year Risk of Prolapse Recurrence.
    Siff LN; Barber MD; Zyczynski HM; Rardin CR; Jakus-Waldman S; Rahn DD; Smith AL; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Gantz MG;
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):792-801. PubMed ID: 32925609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between adjuvant posterior repair and success of native tissue apical suspension.
    Sutkin G; Zyczynski HM; Sridhar A; Jelovsek JE; Rardin CR; Mazloomdoost D; Rahn DD; Nguyen JN; Andy UU; Meyer I; Gantz MG;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. PubMed ID: 31449806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical repair: retrospective comparison of success and serious complications.
    Rogers RG; Nolen TL; Weidner AC; Richter HE; Jelovsek JE; Shepherd JP; Harvie HS; Brubaker L; Menefee SA; Myers D; Hsu Y; Schaffer JI; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1101-1110. PubMed ID: 29802413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative Complications and Perioperative and Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Robotics-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy.
    Oh S; Yi J; Song AY; Jee J; Bae N; Shin JH
    Int Urogynecol J; 2024 Jul; 35(7):1521-1526. PubMed ID: 38900162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perioperative, postoperative and anatomical outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    Kilic GS; Lee T; Lewis K; Demirkiran C; Dursun F; Unlu BS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 May; 41(4):651-654. PubMed ID: 33045854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postoperative complications and unanticipated healthcare encounters following mini-laparotomy vs. laparoscopic/robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: a comparative retrospective study.
    Chill HH; Hadizadeh A; Paya-Ten C; Leffelman A; Chang C; Moss NP; Goldberg RP
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):173. PubMed ID: 38481283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Mesh Weight Affect Time to Failure After Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy?
    Askew AL; Visco AG; Weidner AC; Truong T; Siddiqui NY; Bradley MS
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Sep; 26(9):536-540. PubMed ID: 30681427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postoperative complications and pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following combined pelvic organ prolapse and rectal prolapse surgery compared with pelvic organ prolapse only surgery.
    Wallace SL; Kim Y; Lai E; Mehta S; Gaigbe-Togbe B; Zhang CA; Von Bargen EC; Sokol ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):317.e1-317.e12. PubMed ID: 35654113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
    Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association Between Enlarged Genital Hiatus and Composite Surgical Failure After Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
    Bradley MS; Sridhar A; Ferrante K; Andy UU; Visco AG; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Myers D; Varner E; Mazloomdoost D; Gantz MG;
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2023 May; 29(5):479-488. PubMed ID: 36701331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot-Assisted Sacrocolporectopexy for Multicompartment Prolapse of the Pelvic Floor: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating Functional and Sexual Outcome.
    van Iersel JJ; de Witte CJ; Verheijen PM; Broeders IA; Lenters E; Consten EC; Schraffordt Koops SE
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Oct; 59(10):968-74. PubMed ID: 27602928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Recurrence After Sacrocolpopexy: A Matched Case-Control Study.
    Chang OH; Davidson ERW; Thomas TN; Paraiso MFR; Ferrando CA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e165-e170. PubMed ID: 32282526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative Prolapse Stage as Predictor of Failure of Sacrocolpopexy.
    Aslam MF; Osmundsen B; Edwards SR; Matthews C; Gregory WT
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 26571435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.