These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29426204)

  • 1. Implications of a valuation study for ecological and social indicators associated with Everglades restoration.
    Seeteram NA; Engel V; Mozumder P
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():792-801. PubMed ID: 29426204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Public preferences for ecological indicators used in Everglades restoration.
    Stainback GA; Lai JH; Pienaar EF; Adam DC; Wiederholt R; Vorseth C
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234051. PubMed ID: 32555611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ecological-economic assessment of the effects of freshwater flow in the Florida Everglades on recreational fisheries.
    Brown CE; Bhat MG; Rehage JS; Mirchi A; Boucek R; Engel V; Ault JS; Mozumder P; Watkins D; Sukop M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():480-493. PubMed ID: 29426171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elements of South Florida's Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan.
    Perry W
    Ecotoxicology; 2004 Apr; 13(3):185-93. PubMed ID: 15217243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Much Are Floridians Willing to Pay for Protecting Sea Turtles from Sea Level Rise?
    Hamed A; Madani K; Von Holle B; Wright J; Milon JW; Bossick M
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 57(1):176-88. PubMed ID: 26319030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Environmental impacts to the Everglades ecosystem: a historical perspective and restoration strategies.
    Chimney MJ; Goforth G
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(11-12):93-100. PubMed ID: 11804164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of regional and national values for recovering threatened and endangered marine species in the United States.
    Wallmo K; Lew DK
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 179():38-46. PubMed ID: 27160027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin's impression.
    Khan SU; Liu G; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Khan AA; Ali MAS; Misbahullah
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jan; 27(3):3100-3112. PubMed ID: 31838703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services: a distance decay approach to quantify willingness to pay for improvements in Heihe River Basin ecosystems.
    Khan SU; Khan I; Zhao M; Chien H; Lu Q; Ali MAS; Khan AA; Fahad S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Aug; 26(24):25247-25261. PubMed ID: 31256403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of individual preferences for integrated river basin management: an example of Heihe river basin.
    Khan I; Khan SU; Zhao M; Khan AA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6911-6921. PubMed ID: 30644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services.
    Khan I; Lei H; Ali G; Ali S; Zhao M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31581565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Everglades restoration and water quality challenges in south Florida.
    Perry WB
    Ecotoxicology; 2008 Oct; 17(7):569-78. PubMed ID: 18679794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Value orientation and payment for ecosystem services: Perceived detrimental consequences lead to willingness-to-pay for ecosystem services.
    Obeng EA; Aguilar FX
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 206():458-471. PubMed ID: 29107802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ecological degradation of an inland river basin and an evaluation of the spatial and distance effect on willingness to pay for its improvement.
    Khan I; Zhao M; Khan SU
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Nov; 25(31):31474-31485. PubMed ID: 30203347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Everglades restoration science and decision-making in the face of climate change: a management perspective.
    Estenoz S; Bush E
    Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 55(4):876-83. PubMed ID: 25790777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting ecological responses of the Florida Everglades to possible future climate scenarios: introduction.
    Aumen NG; Havens KE; Best GR; Berry L
    Environ Manage; 2015 Apr; 55(4):741-8. PubMed ID: 25743272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Temporal stability of river ecological restoration based on the assessment of contingent valuation method: a case study of Shanghai urban river].
    Zhang YF; Wang D
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 Apr; 24(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 23898647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments.
    Roesch-McNally GE; Rabotyagov SS
    Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 57(3):585-600. PubMed ID: 26661136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of improving freshwater ecosystem services: South Carolina residents' willingness to pay for improved water quality.
    Ureta JU; Ureta JC; Bower LM; Peoples BK; Motallebi M
    J Environ Manage; 2024 Feb; 353():120260. PubMed ID: 38325279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Joint species distribution models of Everglades wading birds to inform restoration planning.
    D'Acunto LE; Pearlstine L; Romañach SS
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245973. PubMed ID: 33508032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.