BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29426744)

  • 1. Improving dose delivery by adding interstitial catheters to fixed geometry applicators in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
    Otter S; Coates A; Franklin A; Cunningham M; Stewart A
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(3):580-586. PubMed ID: 29426744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed Tomography-Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Introduction of the Technique and a Comparison of Dosimetry With Conventional Intracavitary Brachytherapy.
    Liu ZS; Guo J; Zhao YZ; Lin X; Zhang BY; Zhang C; Wang HY; Yu L; Ren XJ; Wang TJ
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):768-775. PubMed ID: 28267131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of interfractional variation of organs and displacement of catheters during high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies.
    Lee S; Rodney E; Traughber B; Biswas T; Colussi V; Podder T
    Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(6):1192-1198. PubMed ID: 28993108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ring Versus Ovoids and Intracavitary Versus Intracavitary-Interstitial Applicators in Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy: Results From the EMBRACE I Study.
    Serban M; Kirisits C; de Leeuw A; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Nesvacil N; Swamidas J; Hudej R; Lowe G; Hellebust TP; Menon G; Oinam A; Bownes P; Oosterveld B; De Brabandere M; Koedooder K; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Whitney D; Lindegaard J; Tanderup K;
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Apr; 106(5):1052-1062. PubMed ID: 32007365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early outcomes and impact of a hybrid IC/IS applicator for a new MRI-based cervical brachytherapy program.
    Harkenrider MM; Surucu M; Harmon G; Mysz ML; Shea SM; Yacoub J; Goldberg A; Liotta M; Winder A; Potkul R; Roeske JC; Small W
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):187-193. PubMed ID: 29089277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long term experience with 3D image guided brachytherapy and clinical outcome in cervical cancer patients.
    Ribeiro I; Janssen H; De Brabandere M; Nulens A; De Bal D; Vergote I; Van Limbergen E
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 27157510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical feasibility of combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer employing MRI with a tandem/ring applicator in situ and virtual preplanning of the interstitial component.
    Fokdal L; Tanderup K; Hokland SB; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Nielsen SK; Paludan M; Lindegaard JC
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 23452917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dose-volume histogram parameters and local tumor control in magnetic resonance image-guided cervical cancer brachytherapy.
    Dimopoulos JC; Lang S; Kirisits C; Fidarova EF; Berger D; Georg P; Dörr W; Pötter R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Sep; 75(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 19289267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI-guided treatment-planning optimisation in intracavitary or combined intracavitary/interstitial PDR brachytherapy using tandem ovoid applicators in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Tersteeg RJ; Roesink JM; Bijmolt S; Nomden CN; Moerland MA; de Leeuw AA
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):322-30. PubMed ID: 19748695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer using the novel hybrid applicator Venezia: Clinical feasibility and initial results.
    Walter F; Maihöfer C; Schüttrumpf L; Well J; Burges A; Ertl-Wagner B; Mahner S; Belka C; Gallwas J; Corradini S
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):775-781. PubMed ID: 29941345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 45 or 50 Gy, Which is the Optimal Radiotherapy Pelvic Dose in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer in the Perspective of Reaching Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Adaptive Brachytherapy Planning Aims?
    Mazeron R; Petit C; Rivin E; Limkin E; Dumas I; Maroun P; Annede P; Martinetti F; Seisen T; Lefkopoulos D; Chargari C; Haie-Meder C
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2016 Mar; 28(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 26547694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical use of the Utrecht applicator for combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy treatment in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Nomden CN; de Leeuw AA; Moerland MA; Roesink JM; Tersteeg RJ; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Mar; 82(4):1424-30. PubMed ID: 21669505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes and comparison of dosimetric parameters between intracavitary (Fletcher) and combined intracavitary/interstitial (Utrecht) brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Sarwar KA; Hussain S; Syed AS; Khan K; Maqsood T; Azeem T
    Brachytherapy; 2024; 23(1):10-17. PubMed ID: 37813708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of tumor dose, volume and overall treatment time on local control after radiochemotherapy including MRI guided brachytherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Tanderup K; Fokdal LU; Sturdza A; Haie-Meder C; Mazeron R; van Limbergen E; Jürgenliemk-Schulz I; Petric P; Hoskin P; Dörr W; Bentzen SM; Kirisits C; Lindegaard JC; Pötter R
    Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):441-446. PubMed ID: 27350396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Parametrial boosting in locally advanced cervical cancer: combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy vs. intracavitary brachytherapy plus external beam radiotherapy.
    Mohamed S; Kallehauge J; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25455382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A dose planning study on applicator guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Assenholt MS; Petersen JB; Nielsen SK; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18663651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of applying a single treatment plan for both fractions in PDR image guided brachytherapy in cervix cancer.
    Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Fokdal LU; Pedersen EM; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K
    Radiother Oncol; 2013 Apr; 107(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term effectiveness and safety of image-based, transperineal combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Tiwari R; Narayanan GS; Narayanan S; Suresh Kumar P
    Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 31813739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Outcomes of Computed Tomography-Based Volumetric Brachytherapy Planning for Cervical Cancer.
    Simpson DR; Scanderbeg DJ; Carmona R; McMurtrie RM; Einck J; Mell LK; McHale MT; Saenz CC; Plaxe SC; Harrison T; Mundt AJ; Yashar CM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Sep; 93(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 26130230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.