These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29427198)

  • 1. Can the synthetic C view images be used in isolation for diagnosing breast malignancy without reviewing the entire digital breast tomosynthesis data set?
    Murphy MC; Coffey L; O'Neill AC; Quinn C; Prichard R; McNally S
    Ir J Med Sci; 2018 Nov; 187(4):1077-1081. PubMed ID: 29427198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of full-field digital mammograms versus 2D synthesized mammograms for detection of microcalcifications on screening.
    Wahab RA; Lee SJ; Zhang B; Sobel L; Mahoney MC
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 107():14-19. PubMed ID: 30292258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) to Standard 2D Digital Screening Mammography on the Rates of Patient Recall, Cancer Detection, and Recommendations for Short-term Follow-up.
    Powell JL; Hawley JR; Lipari AM; Yildiz VO; Erdal BS; Carkaci S
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):302-307. PubMed ID: 27919540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening Mammography Findings From One Standard Projection Only in the Era of Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Cohen EO; Tso HH; Phalak KA; Mayo RC; Leung JWT
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):445-451. PubMed ID: 29792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.
    Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R
    Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Practice Patterns Following 2011 FDA Approval: A Survey of Breast Imaging Radiologists.
    Gao Y; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Aug; 24(8):947-953. PubMed ID: 28188043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of performance metrics with digital 2D versus tomosynthesis mammography in the diagnostic setting.
    Bahl M; Mercaldo S; Vijapura CA; McCarthy AM; Lehman CD
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):477-484. PubMed ID: 29967957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
    Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): initial experience in a clinical setting.
    Skaane P; Gullien R; Bjørndal H; Eben EB; Ekseth U; Haakenaasen U; Jahr G; Jebsen IN; Krager M
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jun; 53(5):524-9. PubMed ID: 22593120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer Learning From Convolutional Neural Networks for Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
    Mendel K; Li H; Sheth D; Giger M
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 30076083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
    Greenberg JS; Javitt MC; Katzen J; Michael S; Holland AE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 24918774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The simulation of 3D mass models in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Bosmans H; Dance DR; Young KC; Van Ongeval C
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081913. PubMed ID: 25086544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combination of one-view digital breast tomosynthesis with one-view digital mammography versus standard two-view digital mammography: per lesion analysis.
    Gennaro G; Hendrick RE; Toledano A; Paquelet JR; Bezzon E; Chersevani R; di Maggio C; La Grassa M; Pescarini L; Polico I; Proietti A; Baldan E; Pomerri F; Muzzio PC
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2087-94. PubMed ID: 23620367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system to magnified 2D mammography using breast tissue specimens.
    Tucker AW; Calliste J; Gidcumb EM; Wu J; Kuzmiak CM; Hyun N; Zeng D; Lu J; Zhou O; Lee YZ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Dec; 21(12):1547-52. PubMed ID: 25172412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
    Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
    Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital breast tomosynthesis: Image acquisition principles and artifacts.
    Sujlana PS; Mahesh M; Vedantham S; Harvey SC; Mullen LA; Woods RW
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():188-195. PubMed ID: 30236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
    Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.