138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29428179)
1. The diagnosis of mucinous lesions in endometrial samplings by gynaecological pathologists: an analysis of diagnostic reproducibility.
Fadare O; Roma AA; Mhawech-Fauceglia P; Parkash V; Rabban JT
Pathology; 2018 Apr; 50(3):276-285. PubMed ID: 29428179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproducibility of current classifications of endometrial endometrioid glandular proliferations: further evidence supporting a simplified classification.
Ordi J; Bergeron C; Hardisson D; McCluggage WG; Hollema H; Felix A; Soslow RA; Oliva E; Tavassoli FA; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Wells M; Nogales FF
Histopathology; 2014 Jan; 64(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 24111732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Atypical mucinous glandular proliferations in endometrial samplings: follow-up and other clinicopathological findings in 41 cases.
Rawish KR; Desouki MM; Fadare O
Hum Pathol; 2017 May; 63():53-62. PubMed ID: 28232161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The diagnosis of endometrial carcinomas with clear cells by gynecologic pathologists: an assessment of interobserver variability and associated morphologic features.
Fadare O; Parkash V; Dupont WD; Acs G; Atkins KA; Irving JA; Pirog EC; Quade BJ; Quddus MR; Rabban JT; Vang R; Hecht JL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Aug; 36(8):1107-18. PubMed ID: 22790851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens.
Bergeron C; Nogales FF; Masseroli M; Abeler V; Duvillard P; Müller-Holzner E; Pickartz H; Wells M
Am J Surg Pathol; 1999 Sep; 23(9):1102-8. PubMed ID: 10478671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma.
Kendall BS; Ronnett BM; Isacson C; Cho KR; Hedrick L; Diener-West M; Kurman RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 1998 Aug; 22(8):1012-9. PubMed ID: 9706982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter-observer reproducibility of endometrial cytology by the Osaki Study Group method: utilising the Becton Dickinson SurePath
Norimatsu Y; Yamaguchi T; Taira T; Abe H; Sakamoto H; Takenaka M; Yanoh K; Yoshinobu M; Irino S; Hirai Y; Kobayashi TK
Cytopathology; 2016 Dec; 27(6):472-478. PubMed ID: 27109167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: a rare and deceptively bland form of endometrial carcinoma.
Fujiwara M; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 21378544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Zaino RJ; Kauderer J; Trimble CL; Silverberg SG; Curtin JP; Lim PC; Gallup DG
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):804-11. PubMed ID: 16400640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the inter- and intraobserver reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia subgroups and well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma in endometrial curettage specimens.
Izadi-Mood N; Khaniki M; Irvanloo G; Ahmadi SA; Hayeri H; Meysamie A
Arch Iran Med; 2009 Jul; 12(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19566355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinicopathological Characteristics and
Sung JY; Jung YY; Kim HS
Anticancer Res; 2018 May; 38(5):2779-2786. PubMed ID: 29715099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benign endometrial proliferations mimicking malignancies: a review of problematic entities in small biopsy specimens.
Ip PP
Virchows Arch; 2018 Jun; 472(6):907-917. PubMed ID: 29445890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mucinous endometrial epithelial proliferations: a morphologic spectrum of changes with diverse clinical significance.
Nucci MR; Prasad CJ; Crum CP; Mutter GL
Mod Pathol; 1999 Dec; 12(12):1137-42. PubMed ID: 10619266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glandular cell atypia on Papanicolaou smears: interobserver variability in the diagnosis and prediction of cell of origin.
Simsir A; Hwang S; Cangiarella J; Elgert P; Levine P; Sheffield MV; Roberson J; Talley L; Chhieng DC
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 14681938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Papillary proliferation of the endometrium: a clinicopathologic study of 59 cases of simple and complex papillae without cytologic atypia.
Ip PP; Irving JA; McCluggage WG; Clement PB; Young RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Feb; 37(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 23211295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proliferative mucinous lesions of the endometrium: analysis of existing criteria for diagnosing carcinoma in biopsies and curettings.
Vang R; Tavassoli FA
Int J Surg Pathol; 2003 Oct; 11(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 14615821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant variation in the assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma: an interobserver variation study.
McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Wilson GE; Oliva E; Soslow RA; Zaino RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21263250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expert system support using a Bayesian belief network for the classification of endometrial hyperplasia.
Morrison ML; McCluggage WG; Price GJ; Diamond J; Sheeran MR; Mulholland KM; Walsh MY; Montironi R; Bartels PH; Thompson D; Hamilton PW
J Pathol; 2002 Jul; 197(3):403-14. PubMed ID: 12115888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mucinous Proliferations of the Uterine Corpus: Comprehensive Appraisal of an Evolving Spectrum of Neoplasms.
Fadare O
Adv Anat Pathol; 2022 Sep; 29(5):275-296. PubMed ID: 35499137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
