These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29428805)

  • 21. Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers.
    Zago L; Petit L; Jobard G; Hay J; Mazoyer B; Tzourio-Mazoyer N; Karnath HO; Mellet E
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jan; 94():75-83. PubMed ID: 27916670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual line bisection in sinistrals and dextrals as a function of hemispace, hand, and scan direction.
    Brodie EE; Dunn EM
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 15919545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults.
    Rotondaro F; Merola S; Aiello M; Pinto M; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():565-76. PubMed ID: 26188312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors.
    Post RB; Caufield KJ; Welch RB
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(8):856-64. PubMed ID: 11369408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection.
    Arduino LS; Previtali P; Girelli L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hemispatial neglect evaluated by visual line bisection task in schizophrenic patients and their unaffected siblings.
    Ozel-Kizil ET; Baskak B; Gunes E; Cicek M; Atbasoglu EC
    Psychiatry Res; 2012 Dec; 200(2-3):133-6. PubMed ID: 22560806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?
    Drakul A; Bockisch CJ; Tarnutzer AA
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Aug; 116(2):629-36. PubMed ID: 27226452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Influence of Focused and Sustained Spatial Attention on the Allocation of Spatial Attention.
    Lamb DG; Balavage KT; Williamson JB; Knight LA; Heilman KM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2019 Jan; 25(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 30486914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. On the neural origin of pseudoneglect: EEG-correlates of shifts in line bisection performance with manipulation of line length.
    Benwell CS; Harvey M; Thut G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86(100):370-80. PubMed ID: 24128738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Examining the crossmodal consequences of viewing the Müller-Lyer illusion.
    Gallace A; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 May; 162(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 15616811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Sinistrals' upper hand: evidence for handedness differences in the representation of body space.
    Hach S; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):408-18. PubMed ID: 20056306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Eye dominance modulates visuospatial attention.
    Schintu S; Chaumillon R; Guillaume A; Salemme R; Reilly KT; Pisella L; Farnè A
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107314. PubMed ID: 31870684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of spatiotopic factors on bisection of radial lines.
    Chieffi S; Iavarone A; Carlomagno S
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 189(1):129-32. PubMed ID: 18566807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space.
    Varnava A; McCarthy M; Beaumont JG
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(8):1372-8. PubMed ID: 11931941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space.
    Cowey A; Small M; Ellis S
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jan; 37(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9920465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Near and far space neglect: task sensitivity and anatomical substrates.
    Aimola L; Schindler I; Simone AM; Venneri A
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22306826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatial biases in number line bisection tasks are due to a cognitive illusion of length.
    Stöttinger E; Anderson B; Danckert J; Frühholz B; Wood G
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 220(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 22623099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evidence from a line bisection task for visuospatial neglect in left hemiparkinson's disease.
    Lee AC; Harris JP; Atkinson EA; Fowler MS
    Vision Res; 2001 Sep; 41(20):2677-86. PubMed ID: 11520513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space.
    Longo MR; Lourenco SF
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 19951825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Weiss PH; Zilles K
    Neuroimage; 2001 Jul; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.