These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29430088)

  • 1. Incremental techniques in direct composite restoration.
    Chandrasekhar V; Rudrapati L; Badami V; Tummala M
    J Conserv Dent; 2017; 20(6):386-391. PubMed ID: 29430088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A review of polymerization shrinkage stress: current techniques for posterior direct resin restorations.
    Giachetti L; Scaminaci Russo D; Bambi C; Grandini R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):79-88. PubMed ID: 16957794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A rational use of dental materials in posterior direct resin restorations in order to control polymerization shrinkage stress.
    Giachetti L; Bertini F; Bambi C; Scaminaci Russo D
    Minerva Stomatol; 2007 Mar; 56(3):129-38. PubMed ID: 17327817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations?
    Kuijs RH; Fennis WM; Kreulen CM; Barink M; Verdonschot N
    J Dent Res; 2003 Dec; 82(12):967-71. PubMed ID: 14630896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polymerization profile analysis of resin composite dental restorative materials in real time.
    Naoum SJ; Ellakwa A; Morgan L; White K; Martin FE; Lee IB
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 22044773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of the Compliance and Layering Method on the Wall Deflection of Simulated Cavities in Bulk-fill Composite Restoration.
    Kim YJ; Kim R; Ferracane JL; Lee IB
    Oper Dent; 2016; 41(6):e183-e194. PubMed ID: 27820696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cuspal flexure of composite-restored typodont teeth and correlation with polymerization shrinkage values.
    Enochs T; Hill AE; Worley CE; Veríssimo C; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):152-160. PubMed ID: 29061285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
    Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cuspal deflection and depth of cure in resin-based composite restorations filled by using bulk, incremental and transtooth-illumination techniques.
    Campodonico CE; Tantbirojn D; Olin PS; Versluis A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Oct; 142(10):1176-82. PubMed ID: 21965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical methods for the measurement of polymerization kinetics and stresses of dental resin-based composites: A review.
    Ghavami-Lahiji M; Hooshmand T
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2017; 14(4):225-240. PubMed ID: 28928776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molar cusp deformation evaluated by micro-CT and enamel crack formation to compare incremental and bulk-filling techniques.
    Oliveira LRS; Braga SSL; Bicalho AA; Ribeiro MTH; Price RB; Soares CJ
    J Dent; 2018 Jul; 74():71-78. PubMed ID: 29689293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of material properties on stresses at the restoration-dentin interface of composite restorations during polymerization.
    Kahler B; Kotousov A; Borkowski K
    Dent Mater; 2006 Oct; 22(10):942-7. PubMed ID: 16360849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of temperature and humidity on post-gel shrinkage, cusp deformation, bond strength and shrinkage stress - Construction of a chamber to simulate the oral environment.
    Bicalho AA; de Souza SJ; de Rosatto CM; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Mater; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1523-32. PubMed ID: 26518338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives.
    Davidson CL; Feilzer AJ
    J Dent; 1997 Nov; 25(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 9604575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Internal adaptation of composite restorations with or without an intermediate layer: Effect of polymerization shrinkage parameters of the layer material.
    Han SH; Sadr A; Shimada Y; Tagami J; Park SH
    J Dent; 2019 Jan; 80():41-48. PubMed ID: 30391684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing composite restoration polymerization shrinkage stress through resin modified glass-ionomer based adhesives.
    Naoum SJ; Mutzelburg PR; Shumack TG; Thode D; Martin FE; Ellakwa AE
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Dec; 60(4):490-6. PubMed ID: 25476699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.