These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29430136)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of fatigue resistance of two different implant overdenture stud attachments with two different denture base materials: An
    Agrawal N; Jain S; Agrawal D
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 29430136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention of Different Attachment Systems for Digitally Designed Mandibular Implant Overdenture.
    Abdelaziz MS; Fawzy AM; Ghali RM; Nassar HI
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):162-169. PubMed ID: 35344237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retentive force variations in three polyamide and a polyetheretherketone denture attachments for implant-supported overdentures: An in vitro study.
    Βei M; Kamalakidis SN; Pissiotis AL; Michalakis K; Naka O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37244792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandibular overdentures retained by two implants: 10-year results from a crossover clinical trial comparing ball-socket and bar-clip attachments.
    Cune M; Burgers M; van Kampen F; de Putter C; van der Bilt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 20617218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro investigation into retention strength and fatigue resistance of various designs of tooth/implant supported overdentures.
    Fatalla AA; Song K; Du T; Cao Y
    J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2012 Feb; 32(1):124-129. PubMed ID: 22282258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midline denture base strains of glass fiber-reinforced single implant-supported overdentures.
    Gibreel M; Lassila LVJ; Närhi TO; Perea-Lowery L; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):407-412. PubMed ID: 32958304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
    Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An Alternative Incorporation Technique for Minimizing Complications in Attachment-Retained Implant Mandibular Overdentures: Technical Report.
    Sipahi C; Ezmek B
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):814-817. PubMed ID: 33150997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
    De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of implant-supported overdenture with bar/clip and stud attachment designs.
    Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F; Yordshahian F
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 21905896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Ball and Bar Attachment Type on Patient Satisfaction Using Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: A Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Deshpande S; Chandak A; Radke U; Mahalle H; Patil PG
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2022 Dec; 21(4):1175-1179. PubMed ID: 36896084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient-reported outcome measures and clinical performance of implant-retained mandibular overdentures with stud and ball attachments: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Girundi ALG; Ribeiro MCO; Vargas-Moreno VF; Borges GA; Magno MB; Maia LC; Del Bel Cury AA; Marcello-Machado RM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):197-211. PubMed ID: 35931572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.