These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29430142)

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of marginal fit and axial wall adaptability of copings fabricated by metal laser sintering and lost-wax technique: An
    Gaikwad BS; Nazirkar G; Dable R; Singh S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 29430142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal fit and microleakage of cast and metal laser sintered copings--an in vitro study.
    Sundar MK; Chikmagalur SB; Pasha F
    J Prosthodont Res; 2014 Oct; 58(4):252-8. PubMed ID: 25168656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang J; Li H; Xu L; Wang Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):897-904. PubMed ID: 33789799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
    Yildirim B; Paken G
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
    Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of marginal and internal adaptation of copings fabricated from three different fabrication techniques: An
    Arora A; Yadav A; Upadhyaya V; Jain P; Verma M
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 29692562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of Co-Cr Metal Copings Fabricated Using Traditional Casting Techniques and Metal Laser Sintering.
    Gautam N; Khajuria RR; Ahmed R; Sharma S; Hasan S; Hasan S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(1):128-132. PubMed ID: 34326598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
    Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
    Sarda AS; Bedia SV
    Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of internal and marginal fit of two metal ceramic system - in vitro study.
    V H; Ali S A M; N J; Ifthikar M; Senthil S; Basak D; Huda F; Priyanka
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2014 Dec; 8(12):ZC53-6. PubMed ID: 25654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium copings fabricated using the conventional and the direct metal laser sintering techniques: A comparative
    Ullattuthodi S; Cherian KP; Anandkumar R; Nambiar MS
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(4):373-380. PubMed ID: 29249881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation and comparison of the internal fit and marginal accuracy of base metal (nickelchromium) and zirconia copings before and after ceramic veneering: a sem study.
    Regish KM; Sharma D; Prithviraj DR; Nair A; Raghavan R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Mar; 21(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 23682510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal Accuracy and Internal Fit of Dental Copings Fabricated by Modern Additive and Subtractive Digital Technologies.
    Nelson N; K S J; Sunny K
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2017 Mar; 25(1):20-25. PubMed ID: 28569447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal and internal fit of metal copings fabricated with rapid prototyping and conventional waxing.
    Farjood E; Vojdani M; Torabi K; Khaledi AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jan; 117(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 27460320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
    Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of Metal Copings Fabricated using Direct Metal Laser Sintering, Computer-Aided Milling, Ringless Casting, and Traditional Casting Techniques: An
    James AE; Umamaheswari B; Shanthana Lakshmi CB
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2018; 9(3):421-426. PubMed ID: 30166838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
    Yildirim B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.