220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29430890)
1. Tricuspid valve replacement: results of an orphan procedure - which is the best prosthesis?
Wiedemann D; Rupprechter V; Mascherbauer J; Kammerlander A; Mora B; Dimitrov K; Weber B; Andreas M; Laufer G; Kocher A
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2018 Aug; 59(4):626-632. PubMed ID: 29430890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tricuspid valve replacement: bioprostheses are preferable.
Dalrymple-Hay MJ; Leung Y; Ohri SK; Haw MP; Ross JK; Livesey SA; Monro JL
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Nov; 8(6):644-8. PubMed ID: 10616242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Which type of valve should we use in tricuspid position? Long-term comparison between mechanical and biological valves.
Redondo Palacios A; López Menéndez J; Miguelena Hycka J; Martín García M; Varela Barca L; Ferreiro Marzal A; Muñoz Pérez R; Oliva de Anquín E; García Andrade I; Centella Hernández T; Celemín Canorea D; Rodríguez-Roda Stuart J
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Oct; 58(5):739-746. PubMed ID: 27636399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Durability of bioprostheses for the tricuspid valve in patients with congenital heart disease.
Burri M; Vogt MO; Hörer J; Cleuziou J; Kasnar-Samprec J; Kühn A; Lange R; Schreiber C
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Nov; 50(5):988-993. PubMed ID: 27005978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tricuspid valve replacement. Fifteen years of experience with mechanical prostheses and bioprostheses.
Scully HE; Armstrong CS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 109(6):1035-41. PubMed ID: 7776666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Appraisal of Long-Term Outcomes of Tricuspid Valve Replacement in the Current Perspective.
Anselmi A; Ruggieri VG; Harmouche M; Flécher E; Corbineau H; Langanay T; Lelong B; Verhoye JP; Leguerrier A
Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):863-71. PubMed ID: 26675557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twenty-five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses.
Garatti A; Nano G; Bruschi G; Canziani A; Colombo T; Frigiola A; Martinelli L; Menicanti L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Apr; 93(4):1146-53. PubMed ID: 22342993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prosthetic replacement of tricuspid valve: bioprosthetic or mechanical.
Kaplan M; Kut MS; Demirtas MM; Cimen S; Ozler A
Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Feb; 73(2):467-73. PubMed ID: 11845861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tricuspid valve replacement: postoperative and long-term results.
Van Nooten GJ; Caes F; Taeymans Y; Van Belleghem Y; François K; De Bacquer D; Deuvaert FE; Wellens F; Primo G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1995 Sep; 110(3):672-9. PubMed ID: 7564433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Negm S; Arafat AA; Elatafy EE; Fawzy HF
Heart Lung Circ; 2021 Mar; 30(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 33229238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological or mechanical prostheses in tricuspid position? A meta-analysis of intra-institutional results.
Rizzoli G; Vendramin I; Nesseris G; Bottio T; Guglielmi C; Schiavon L
Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 May; 77(5):1607-14. PubMed ID: 15111151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Percutaneous Transcatheter Treatment for Tricuspid Bioprosthesis Failure.
Ruparelia N; Mangieri A; Ancona M; Giannini F; Agricola E; Montorfano M; De Bonis M; Alfieri O; Colombo A; Latib A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 88(6):994-1001. PubMed ID: 27184831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term clinical outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement using bovine versus porcine valves: a nationwide population-based study.
Sohn SH; Kang Y; Kim JS; Hwang HY; Kim KH; Choi JW
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Jul; 64(1):. PubMed ID: 37079738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tricuspid valve replacement: UK Heart Valve Registry mid-term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses.
Ratnatunga CP; Edwards MB; Dore CJ; Taylor KM
Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6):1940-7. PubMed ID: 9930473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long term results comparing mechanical and biological prostheses in the tricuspid valve position: which valve types are better--mechanical or biological prostheses?
Songur CM; Simsek E; Ozen A; Kocabeyoglu S; Donmez TA
Heart Lung Circ; 2014 Dec; 23(12):1175-8. PubMed ID: 25153357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of structural valve deterioration after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement: Bovine pericardial versus porcine valves.
Kang Y; Hwang HY; Sohn SH; Choi JW; Kim KH; Kim KB
Artif Organs; 2021 Aug; 45(8):911-918. PubMed ID: 33432612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The valve choice in tricuspid valve replacement: 25 years of experience.
Van Nooten GJ; Caes FL; François KJ; Taeymans Y; Primo G; Wellens F; Leclerq JL; Deuvaert FE
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1995; 9(8):441-6; discussion 446-7. PubMed ID: 7495588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tricuspid valve replacement: an analysis of 25 years of experience at a single center.
Carrier M; Hébert Y; Pellerin M; Bouchard D; Perrault LP; Cartier R; Basmajian A; Pagé P; Poirier NC
Ann Thorac Surg; 2003 Jan; 75(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 12537191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results of isolated tricuspid valve replacement.
Tokunaga S; Masuda M; Shiose A; Tomita Y; Morita S; Tominaga R
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2008 Jan; 16(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 18245701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
