These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29431022)
1. Effects of global and local task repetition proportion on n - 2 repetition costs. Scheil J; Kleinsorge T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):579-588. PubMed ID: 29431022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition. Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further investigating effects of task repetition proportion on Scheil J; Kleinsorge T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 32238035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Higher-order cognitive control in dual tasks: Evidence from task-pair switching. Hirsch P; Nolden S; Koch I J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):569-580. PubMed ID: 28080113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs. Gade M; Souza AS; Druey MD; Oberauer K Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 27517876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the overlap between bilingual language control and domain-general executive control. Branzi FM; Calabria M; Boscarino ML; Costa A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 May; 166():21-30. PubMed ID: 27043252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of N-3 on N-2 repetition costs in task switching. Schuch S; Grange JA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 May; 41(3):760-7. PubMed ID: 25197760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Grange JA; Kowalczyk AW; O'Loughlin R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 28383961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training. Kattner F; Samaan L; Schubert T Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1044-1061. PubMed ID: 30805872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repetition or alternation of context influences sequential congruency effect depending on the presence of contingency. Atalay NB; Inan AB Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):490-507. PubMed ID: 26908247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Task switching costs in preschool children and adults. Peng A; Kirkham NZ; Mareschal D J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():59-72. PubMed ID: 29587131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Response-repetition effects in task switching - dissociating effects of anatomical and spatial response discriminability. Koch I; Schuch S; Vu KP; Proctor RW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Mar; 136(3):399-404. PubMed ID: 21296307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Schuch S; Koch I Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Nov; 135(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 20719288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Action control in task switching: do action effects modulate Nā-ā2 repetition costs in task switching? Schuch S; Sommer A; Lukas S Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):146-156. PubMed ID: 29147794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of absolute and relative practice on n-2 repetition costs. Scheil J Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():65-9. PubMed ID: 26745367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues. Dreisbach G; Haider H; Kluwe RH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 May; 28(3):468-83. PubMed ID: 12018499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition. Grange JA; Juvina I; Houghton G Psychol Res; 2013 Mar; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 22327120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Distinct response components indicate that binding is the primary cause of response repetition effects. Hydock C; Patai EZ; Sohn MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1598-611. PubMed ID: 23647336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]