These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29432110)

  • 1. The Cochlear Implant EEG Artifact Recorded From an Artificial Brain for Complex Acoustic Stimuli.
    Wagner L; Maurits N; Maat B; Baskent D; Wagner AE
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2018 Feb; 26(2):392-399. PubMed ID: 29432110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel method for device-related electroencephalography artifact suppression to explore cochlear implant-related cortical changes in single-sided deafness.
    Kim K; Punte AK; Mertens G; Van de Heyning P; Park KJ; Choi H; Choi JW; Song JJ
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Nov; 255():22-8. PubMed ID: 26231621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimization of cochlear implant artifact in cortical auditory evoked potentials in children.
    Bakhos D; Roux S; Robier A; Bonnet-Brilhault F; Lescanne E; Bruneau N
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Nov; 76(11):1627-32. PubMed ID: 22910837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semi-automatic attenuation of cochlear implant artifacts for the evaluation of late auditory evoked potentials.
    Viola FC; De Vos M; Hine J; Sandmann P; Bleeck S; Eyles J; Debener S
    Hear Res; 2012 Feb; 284(1-2):6-15. PubMed ID: 22234161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neural tracking of the speech envelope in cochlear implant users.
    Somers B; Verschueren E; Francart T
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Feb; 16(1):016003. PubMed ID: 30444216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.
    Mina F; Attina V; Duroc Y; Veuillet E; Truy E; Thai-Van H
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174462. PubMed ID: 28350887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recording EEG in cochlear implant users: Guidelines for experimental design and data analysis for optimizing signal quality and minimizing artifacts.
    Intartaglia B; Zeitnouni AG; Lehmann A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2022 Jun; 375():109592. PubMed ID: 35367234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selective attention decoding in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Dolhopiatenko H; Nogueira W
    Front Neurosci; 2022; 16():1057605. PubMed ID: 36711138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear implant artifact attenuation in late auditory evoked potentials: a single channel approach.
    Mc Laughlin M; Lopez Valdes A; Reilly RB; Zeng FG
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():84-95. PubMed ID: 23727626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Source analysis of auditory steady-state responses in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Luke R; De Vos A; Wouters J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Feb; 147():568-576. PubMed ID: 27894891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Avoiding the ballistocardiogram (BCG) artifact of EEG data acquired simultaneously with fMRI by pulse-triggered presentation of stimuli.
    Ertl M; Kirsch V; Leicht G; Karch S; Olbrich S; Reiser M; Hegerl U; Pogarell O; Mulert C
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Feb; 186(2):231-41. PubMed ID: 19931564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Independent component analysis for cochlear implant artifacts attenuation from electrically evoked auditory steady-state response measurements.
    Deprez H; Gransier R; Hofmann M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Neural Eng; 2018 Feb; 15(1):016006. PubMed ID: 29211684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward Automated Cochlear Implant Fitting Procedures Based on Event-Related Potentials.
    Finke M; Billinger M; Büchner A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e118-e127. PubMed ID: 27787394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for removing cochlear implant artifact.
    Friesen LM; Picton TW
    Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 19878712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of an artifact reduction strategy for electrically evoked auditory steady-state responses: Simulations and measurements.
    Bahmer A; Pieper S; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 296():57-68. PubMed ID: 29291927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the cochlear implant artifact correction tool for auditory electrophysiology.
    Miller S; Zhang Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Aug; 577():51-5. PubMed ID: 24946164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of cochlear implant artifact removal techniques using the continuous wavelet transform.
    Sinkiewicz D; Friesen L; Ghoraani B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():5482-5. PubMed ID: 25571235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.