195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29433804)
1. Stereotactic Breast Biopsy With Benign Results Does Not Negatively Affect Future Screening Adherence.
Lewin AA; Gao Y; Lin Young LL; Albert ML; Babb JS; Toth HK; Moy L; Heller SL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Apr; 15(4):622-629. PubMed ID: 29433804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What Happens after a Diagnosis of High-Risk Breast Lesion at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy? An Observational Study of Postdiagnosis Management and Imaging Adherence.
Gao Y; Albert M; Young Lin LL; Lewin AA; Babb JS; Heller SL; Moy L
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):423-431. PubMed ID: 29378151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency of Discordant Lesions and False-negative Cancers at Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Biopsy.
Heller SL; Jaglan S; Babb JS; Melsaether A; Toth HB; Moy L
Acad Radiol; 2016 Aug; 23(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 27161209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Overstated Harms of Breast Cancer Screening? A Large Outcomes Analysis of Complications Associated With 9-Gauge Stereotactic Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy.
Lin LLY; Gao Y; Lewin AA; Toth HK; Heller SL; Moy L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):925-932. PubMed ID: 30741561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compliance With Screening Mammography Guidelines After a False-Positive Mammogram.
Hardesty LA; Lind KE; Gutierrez EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Sep; 13(9):1032-8. PubMed ID: 27233908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of short-interval follow-up mammography after a benign-concordant stereotactic breast biopsy result.
Maldonado S; Gandhi N; Ha T; Choi P; Khalkhali I; Kalantari BN; Dauphine C
Breast; 2018 Dec; 42():50-53. PubMed ID: 30172804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions.
Tsai HY; Huang ST; Chao MF; Kan JY; Hsu JS; Hou MF; Chiu HC
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108982. PubMed ID: 32334370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast cancer detection with short-interval follow-up compared with return to annual screening in patients with benign stereotactic or US-guided breast biopsy results.
Johnson JM; Johnson AK; O'Meara ES; Miglioretti DL; Geller BM; Hotaling EN; Herschorn SD
Radiology; 2015 Apr; 275(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 25423143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A diagnostic strategy for breast calcifications based on a long-term follow-up of 615 lesions.
Yonekura R; Horii R; Iwase T; Gomi N; Kitagawa M; Akiyama F; Ohno S
Jpn J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):237-244. PubMed ID: 30569402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results, follow-up and correlation with radiological suspicion.
Zuiani C; Mazzarella F; Londero V; Linda A; Puglisi F; Bazzocchi M
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):304-17. PubMed ID: 17361368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature.
Jackman RJ; Marzoni FA; Rosenberg J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Feb; 192(2):341-51. PubMed ID: 19155393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study.
Pfarl G; Helbich TH; Riedl CC; Wagner T; Gnant M; Rudas M; Liberman L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1503-7. PubMed ID: 12438044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benign breast lesions: minimally invasive vacuum-assisted biopsy with 11-gauge needles patient acceptance and effect on follow-up imaging findings.
Huber S; Wagner M; Medl M; Czembirek H
Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):783-90. PubMed ID: 12616021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Atypical ductal hyperplasia: can some lesions be defined as probably benign after stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy, eliminating the recommendation for surgical excision?
Jackman RJ; Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):548-54. PubMed ID: 12147855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is zero underestimation feasible? Extended Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy in solid lesions - a blind study.
Zografos GC; Zagouri F; Sergentanis TN; Koulocheri D; Nonni A; Oikonomou V; Domeyer P; Kotsani M; Fotiadis C; Bramis J
World J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 5():53. PubMed ID: 17501997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lobular neoplasia at 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy: correlation with surgical excisional biopsy and mammographic follow-up.
Mahoney MC; Robinson-Smith TM; Shaughnessy EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Oct; 187(4):949-54. PubMed ID: 16985141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy and outcomes of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy for diagnosis and management of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Tsai HY; Chao MF; Ou-Yang F; Kan JY; Hsu JS; Hou MF; Chiu HC
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 35(10):640-645. PubMed ID: 31271510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
