257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29433869)
1. Trends in laparoscopic colorectal surgery over time from 2005-2014 using the NSQIP database.
Davis CH; Shirkey BA; Moore LW; Gaglani T; Du XL; Bailey HR; Cusick MV
J Surg Res; 2018 Mar; 223():16-21. PubMed ID: 29433869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.
Bhama AR; Charlton ME; Schmitt MB; Cromwell JW; Byrn JC
Colorectal Dis; 2015 Mar; 17(3):257-64. PubMed ID: 25311007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in the Emergency Setting: Trends in the Province of Ontario.
Musselman RP; Gomes T; Chan BP; Auer RC; Moloo H; Mamdani M; Al-Omran M; Al-Obeed O; Boushey RP
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2015 Oct; 25(5):430-5. PubMed ID: 25793352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A National study on the adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly population: current state and value proposition.
Keller DS; Qiu J; Kiran RP
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Oct; 23(10):965-972. PubMed ID: 31598786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trends in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approaches to Colorectal Operations.
Hajirawala LN; Leonardi C; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Barton JS
Am Surg; 2023 May; 89(5):2129-2131. PubMed ID: 34318696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database.
Bhama AR; Obias V; Welch KB; Vandewarker JF; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1576-84. PubMed ID: 26169638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The minimally invasive approach is associated with reduced surgical site infections in obese patients undergoing proctectomy.
Pasam RT; Esemuede IO; Lee-Kong SA; Kiran RP
Tech Coloproctol; 2015 Dec; 19(12):733-43. PubMed ID: 26415943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rates, trends, and short-term outcomes of colorectal resections for endometriosis: An ACS-NSQIP review.
Thiels CA; Shenoy CC; Ubl DS; Habermann EB; Kelley SR; Mathis KL
Int J Surg; 2016 Jul; 31():5-9. PubMed ID: 27212593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Trends and outcomes in laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer from 2005 to 2016 using the ACS-NSQIP database, a retrospective cohort study.
Davis CH; Gaglani T; Moore LW; Du XL; Hwang H; Yamal JM; Bailey HR; Cusick MV
Int J Surg; 2019 Mar; 63():71-76. PubMed ID: 30771485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. National trends in resection of the distal pancreas.
Rosales-Velderrain A; Bowers SP; Goldberg RF; Clarke TM; Buchanan MA; Stauffer JA; Asbun HJ
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Aug; 18(32):4342-9. PubMed ID: 22969197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rectal prolapse in the elderly: trends in surgical management and outcomes from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.
Clark CE; Jupiter DC; Thomas JS; Papaconstantinou HT
J Am Coll Surg; 2012 Nov; 215(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 22917645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing trends in laparoscopic colostomy reversal and evaluating outcomes when compared to open procedures.
Pei KY; Davis KA; Zhang Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):695-701. PubMed ID: 28726139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Redefining contraindications to laparoscopic colorectal resection for high-risk patients.
Marks JH; Kawun UB; Hamdan W; Marks G
Surg Endosc; 2008 Aug; 22(8):1899-904. PubMed ID: 18347862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.
Keller DS; Parikh N; Senagore AJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 Apr; 31(4):1855-1862. PubMed ID: 27572064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic, laparoscopic, and open colectomy: a case-matched comparison from the ACS-NSQIP.
Benlice C; Aytac E; Costedio M; Kessler H; Abbas MA; Remzi FH; Gorgun E
Int J Med Robot; 2017 Sep; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 27766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What have we learned in minimally invasive colorectal surgery from NSQIP and NIS large databases? A systematic review.
Batista RodrÃguez G; Balla A; Corradetti S; Martinez C; Hernández P; Bollo J; Targarona EM
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jun; 33(6):663-681. PubMed ID: 29623415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physical Well-Being and Route of Benign Hysterectomy.
Waldman I; Wagner S; Kulaylat AS; Deimling TA
Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(5):456-461. PubMed ID: 30177340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A laparoscopic approach reduces short-term complications and length of stay following ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease: an analysis of outcomes from the NSQIP database.
Lee Y; Fleming FJ; Deeb AP; Gunzler D; Messing S; Monson JR
Colorectal Dis; 2012 May; 14(5):572-7. PubMed ID: 21831174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A National Database Analysis Comparing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Laparoscopic vs Open Colectomies: Inherent Variance May Impact Outcomes.
Schlussel AT; Delaney CP; Maykel JA; Lustik MB; Nishtala M; Steele SR
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Sep; 59(9):843-54. PubMed ID: 27505113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
