These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
617 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29433882)
21. Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study. Kowalewski KF; Schmidt MW; Proctor T; Pohl M; Wennberg E; Karadza E; Romero P; Kenngott HG; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1656-1667. PubMed ID: 29435749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of robotic assistance on mental workload and cognitive performance of surgical trainees performing a complex minimally invasive suturing task. Lau E; Alkhamesi NA; Schlachta CM Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2551-2559. PubMed ID: 31482359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting. Leijte E; de Blaauw I; Van Workum F; Rosman C; Botden S Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3679-3689. PubMed ID: 31754849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Retention of laparoscopic and robotic skills among medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Orlando MS; Thomaier L; Abernethy MG; Chen CCG Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3306-3312. PubMed ID: 28078455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons. Hsu KE; Man FY; Gizicki RA; Feldman LS; Fried GM Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):196-201. PubMed ID: 17705087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer. Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Laparoscopic and robotic skills are transferable in a simulation setting: a randomized controlled trial. Thomaier L; Orlando M; Abernethy M; Paka C; Chen CCG Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3279-3285. PubMed ID: 27924388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy. Stefanidis D; Hope WW; Scott DJ Surg Endosc; 2011 Jul; 25(7):2141-6. PubMed ID: 21184110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ergonomic analysis of laparoscopic and robotic surgical task performance at various experience levels. Zárate Rodriguez JG; Zihni AM; Ohu I; Cavallo JA; Ray S; Cho S; Awad MM Surg Endosc; 2019 Jun; 33(6):1938-1943. PubMed ID: 30350099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms. Quinn KM; Chen X; Griffiths C; Chen G; Osayi S; Husain S Surg Endosc; 2023 Nov; 37(11):8483-8488. PubMed ID: 37759146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users. Lin DW; Romanelli JR; Kuhn JN; Thompson RE; Bush RW; Seymour NE Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):209-14. PubMed ID: 18297349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Behera K; McKenna M; Smith L; McKnight G; Horwood J; Davies MM; Torkington J; Ansell J J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 38214801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems. Dakin GF; Gagner M Surg Endosc; 2003 Apr; 17(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 12582769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. Berguer R; Smith W J Surg Res; 2006 Jul; 134(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 16376941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons. McNatt SS; Smith CD Surg Endosc; 2001 Oct; 15(10):1085-9. PubMed ID: 11727075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS™) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Santos BF; Enter D; Soper NJ; Hungness ES Surg Endosc; 2011 Feb; 25(2):483-90. PubMed ID: 20585958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Training program for fundamental surgical skill in robotic laparoscopic surgery. Suh I; Mukherjee M; Oleynikov D; Siu KC Int J Med Robot; 2011 Sep; 7(3):327-33. PubMed ID: 21688381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Task analysis of laparoscopic camera control schemes. Ellis RD; Munaco AJ; Reisner LA; Klein MD; Composto AM; Pandya AK; King BW Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 26648563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Training improves laparoscopic tasks performance and decreases operator workload. Hu JS; Lu J; Tan WB; Lomanto D Surg Endosc; 2016 May; 30(5):1742-6. PubMed ID: 26173550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]