196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29434422)
1. Validity of the Fitbit One for Measuring Activity in Community-Dwelling Stroke Survivors.
Hui J; Heyden R; Bao T; Accettone N; McBay C; Richardson J; Tang A
Physiother Can; 2018; 70(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 29434422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.
Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ
J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of PiezoRx Pedometer Derived Sedentary Time.
Donahoe K; Macdonald DJ; Tremblay MS; Saunders TJ
Int J Exerc Sci; 2018; 11(7):552-560. PubMed ID: 29997741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validating Fitbit Zip for monitoring physical activity of children in school: a cross-sectional study.
Mooses K; Oja M; Reisberg S; Vilo J; Kull M
BMC Public Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):858. PubMed ID: 29996797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Fitbit One® for physical activity measurement at an upper torso attachment site.
Diaz KM; Krupka DJ; Chang MJ; Shaffer JA; Ma Y; Goldsmith J; Schwartz JE; Davidson KW
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():213. PubMed ID: 27068022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Validation Study of the Fitbit One in Daily Life Using Different Time Intervals.
Middelweerd A; VAN DER Ploeg HP; VAN Halteren A; Twisk JWR; Brug J; Te Velde SJ
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2017 Jun; 49(6):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 28511193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Formative Evaluation of Consumer-Grade Activity Monitors Worn by Older Adults: Test-Retest Reliability and Criterion Validity of Step Counts.
Maganja SA; Clarke DC; Lear SA; Mackey DC
JMIR Form Res; 2020 Aug; 4(8):e16537. PubMed ID: 32651956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions.
Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of Fitbit-Flex as a measure of free-living physical activity in a community-based phase III cardiac rehabilitation population.
Alharbi M; Bauman A; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Eur J Prev Cardiol; 2016 Sep; 23(14):1476-85. PubMed ID: 26907794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of the ActivPAL and Fitbit Charge 2 in measuring step count in Cystic Fibrosis.
Curran M; Tierney A; Collins L; Kennedy L; McDonnell C; Sheikhi A; Walsh C; Casserly B; Cahalan R
Physiother Theory Pract; 2022 Nov; 38(13):2962-2972. PubMed ID: 34369283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Physical activity among children: objective measurements using Fitbit One
Hamari L; Kullberg T; Ruohonen J; Heinonen OJ; Díaz-Rodríguez N; Lilius J; Pakarinen A; Myllymäki A; Leppänen V; Salanterä S
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):161. PubMed ID: 28427441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of the
Paul SS; Tiedemann A; Hassett LM; Ramsay E; Kirkham C; Chagpar S; Sherrington C
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med; 2015; 1(1):e000013. PubMed ID: 27900119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke.
Schaffer SD; Holzapfel SD; Fulk G; Bosch PR
Physiother Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 33(10):788-796. PubMed ID: 28777710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validity and Reliability of Fitbit Flex for Step Count, Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure.
Sushames A; Edwards A; Thompson F; McDermott R; Gebel K
PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161224. PubMed ID: 27589592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Physical Activity Measured by a Consumer Wearable Activity Tracker and That Measured by Self-Report: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Health eHeart Study.
Beagle AJ; Tison GH; Aschbacher K; Olgin JE; Marcus GM; Pletcher MJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Dec; 8(12):e22090. PubMed ID: 33372896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitor as a Practical Way to Measure Walking Intensity During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation.
Klassen TD; Semrau JA; Dukelow SP; Bayley MT; Hill MD; Eng JJ
Stroke; 2017 Sep; 48(9):2614-2617. PubMed ID: 28784922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking.
Takacs J; Pollock CL; Guenther JR; Bahar M; Napier C; Hunt MA
J Sci Med Sport; 2014 Sep; 17(5):496-500. PubMed ID: 24268570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gait quality and velocity influences activity tracker accuracy in individuals post-stroke.
Clay L; Webb M; Hargest C; Adhia DB
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2019 Sep; 26(6):412-417. PubMed ID: 31141461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A Mobile Health Team Challenge to Promote Stepping and Stair Climbing Activities: Exploratory Feasibility Study.
Liew SJ; Gorny AW; Tan CS; Müller-Riemenschneider F
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e12665. PubMed ID: 32014845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE FITBIT FLEX™ AND ACTIGRAPH GT3X+ AT JOGGING AND RUNNING SPEEDS.
Jones D; Crossley K; Dascombe B; Hart HF; Kemp J
Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2018 Aug; 13(5):860-870. PubMed ID: 30276018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
