These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2943599)

  • 1. Different effects of zimelidine on the reinforcing properties of d-amphetamine and morphine on conditioned place preference in rats.
    Kruszewska A; Romandini S; Samanin R
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1986 Jun; 125(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 2943599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of ritanserin on the rewarding properties of d-amphetamine, morphine and diazepam revealed by conditioned place preference in rats.
    Nomikos GG; Spyraki C
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1988 Aug; 30(4):853-8. PubMed ID: 3147460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuroleptics block the positive reinforcing effects of amphetamine but not of morphine as measured by place conditioning.
    Mackey WB; van der Kooy D
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Jan; 22(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 2858106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Triazolam attenuates amphetamine but not morphine conditioned place preferences.
    Pettit HO; Batsell WR; Mueller K
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 98(4):483-6. PubMed ID: 2505288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dopaminergic substrates of amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning.
    Spyraki C; Fibiger HC; Phillips AG
    Brain Res; 1982 Dec; 253(1-2):185-93. PubMed ID: 6817850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 5HT3 receptor antagonists block morphine- and nicotine- but not amphetamine-induced reward.
    Carboni E; Acquas E; Leone P; Di Chiara G
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1989; 97(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 2498925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tolerance and selective cross-tolerance to the motivational effects of opioids.
    Shippenberg TS; Emmett-Oglesby MW; Ayesta FJ; Herz A
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 96(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 3147470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of diazepam on conditioned place preference induced by morphine or amphetamine in the rat.
    Leri F; Franklin KB
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Jul; 150(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 10958076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noradrenergic role in the self-administration of morphine or amphetamine.
    Davis WM; Smith SG; Khalsa JH
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1975; 3(3):477-84. PubMed ID: 168592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The amphetamine-like reinforcing effect and mechanism of L-deprenyl on conditioned place preference in mice.
    Wu WR; Zhu XZ
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1999 Jan; 364(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9920178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Glycyl-glutamine, an endogenous beta-endorphin-derived peptide, inhibits morphine-induced conditioned place preference, tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal.
    Cavun S; Göktalay G; Millington WR
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 2005 Nov; 315(2):949-58. PubMed ID: 16079299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conditioned place preference: an evaluation of morphine's positive reinforcing properties.
    Blander A; Hunt T; Blair R; Amit Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1984; 84(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 6436880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Restrained rats learn amphetamine-conditioned locomotion, but not place preference.
    Swerdlow NR; Koob GF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1984; 84(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 6438675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inhibition of reinforcing effects of morphine and motivational aspects of naloxone-precipitated opioid withdrawal by N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, memantine.
    Popik P; Danysz W
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1997 Feb; 280(2):854-65. PubMed ID: 9023300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Isolation rearing prevents the reinforcing properties of amphetamine in a conditioned place preference paradigm.
    Wongwitdecha N; Marsden CA
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1995 Jun; 279(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 7556389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of the stimulus effects of morphine by d-amphetamine.
    Gaiardi M; Bartoletti M; Gubellini C; Bacchi A; Babbini M
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Jan; 59(1):249-53. PubMed ID: 9443562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lesions of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus block drug-induced reinforcement but not amphetamine-induced locomotion.
    Olmstead MC; Franklin KB
    Brain Res; 1994 Feb; 638(1-2):29-35. PubMed ID: 8199867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of drugs interacting with serotonergic 5HT3 and 5HT4 receptors on morphine place conditioning.
    Bisaga A; Sikora J; Kostowski W
    Pol J Pharmacol; 1993; 45(5-6):513-9. PubMed ID: 8012474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blockade of D-1 receptors by SCH 23390 antagonizes morphine- and amphetamine-induced place preference conditioning.
    Leone P; Di Chiara G
    Eur J Pharmacol; 1987 Mar; 135(2):251-4. PubMed ID: 3556198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associative factors in drug pretreatment effects on gustatory conditioning: cross-drug effects.
    Cappell H; Poulos CX
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1979 Aug; 64(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 115043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.