131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29436850)
1. Mammography cancer detection: comparison of single 8MP and pair of 5MP reporting monitors.
Strudley CJ; Young KC; Warren LM
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170246. PubMed ID: 29436850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of masses and microcalcifications of breast cancer on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors and 5-megapixel LCD monitors: an observer performance study.
Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Soeda H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Sakai S; Furuya A; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Honda H
Eur Radiol; 2007 May; 17(5):1365-71. PubMed ID: 17093968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LCD versus CRT monitors for digital mammography: a comparison of observer performance for the detection of clustered microcalcifications and masses.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Lee EH; Park JS; Jang MJ
Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1104-8. PubMed ID: 19922305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
Kang BJ; Kim SH; Choi BG
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance in differentiation of breast lesion on digital mammograms: comparison among hard-copy film, 3-megapixel LCD monitor, and 5-megapixel LCD monitor.
Kamitani T; Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Okafuji T; Sunami S; Hatakenaka M; Ishii N; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
Clin Imaging; 2011; 35(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 21872122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of image processing on the detection of cancers in digital mammography.
Warren LM; Given-Wilson RM; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Halling-Brown MD; Mackenzie A; Chakraborty DP; Bosmans H; Dance DR; Young KC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 25055275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effects of 3-megapixel and 5-megapixel monitors on detecting micro-calcification in high- and low-resolution breast images].
Hu X; Gu Y; Wu B; Li R; Peng W; Mao J; Zheng X
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 30(2):245-8. PubMed ID: 23858741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitors and 5-megapixel liquid crystal monitors for soft-copy reading in full-field digital mammography.
Schueller G; Schueller-Weidekamm C; Pinker K; Memarsadeghi M; Weber M; Helbich TH
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 19481396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancer detection rates using four different types of mammography detectors.
Mackenzie A; Warren LM; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Given-Wilson RM; Dance DR; Chakraborty DP; Halling-Brown MD; Looney PT; Young KC
Eur Radiol; 2016 Mar; 26(3):874-83. PubMed ID: 26105023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Funke M; Wiese M; von Heyden D; Grabbe E
Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Zooming method (x 2.0) of digital mammography vs digital magnification view (x 1.8) in full-field digital mammography for the diagnosis of microcalcifications.
Kim MJ; Youk JH; Kang DR; Choi SH; Kwak JY; Son EJ; Kim EK
Br J Radiol; 2010 Jun; 83(990):486-92. PubMed ID: 19752171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Image processing can cause some malignant soft-tissue lesions to be missed in digital mammography images.
Warren LM; Halling-Brown MD; Looney PT; Dance DR; Wallis MG; Given-Wilson RM; Wilkinson L; McAvinchey R; Young KC
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):799.e1-799.e8. PubMed ID: 28457521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Initial clinical experiences with digital full-field mammography].
Grebe S; Diekmann F; Bick U; Paepke S; Winzer KJ; Hamm B
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(11):589-94. PubMed ID: 11127776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.
Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Kontogiannis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
Invest Radiol; 2001 Dec; 36(12):726-33. PubMed ID: 11753144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a wavelet-based computer-assisted detection system for identifying microcalcifications in digital full-field mammography.
Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Bollow M; Hermann KG; Richter K; Heinlein P; Schneider W; Hamm B
Acta Radiol; 2004 Apr; 45(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 15191095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.
Nishikawa RM; Acharyya S; Gatsonis C; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Marques HS; D'Orsi CJ; Farria DM; Kanal KM; Mahoney MC; Rebner M; Staiger MJ;
Radiology; 2009 Apr; 251(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 19332845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
