These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29437152)

  • 1. Focused ultrasound transducer spatial peak intensity estimation: a comparison of methods.
    Civale J; Rivens I; Shaw A; Ter Haar G
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(5):055015. PubMed ID: 29437152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach.
    Canney MS; Bailey MR; Crum LA; Khokhlova VA; Sapozhnikov OA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2406-20. PubMed ID: 19062878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic field characterization of a clinical magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system inside the magnet bore.
    Kothapalli SVVN; Altman MB; Partanen A; Wan L; Gach HM; Straube W; Hallahan DE; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 28626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Method to optimize the placement of a single-element transducer for transcranial focused ultrasound.
    Park TY; Pahk KJ; Kim H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Oct; 179():104982. PubMed ID: 31443869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation.
    Younan Y; Deffieux T; Larrat B; Fink M; Tanter M; Aubry JF
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082902. PubMed ID: 23927357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.
    Wear KA; Howard SM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2019 Sep; 66(9):1453-1464. PubMed ID: 31247548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative estimation of ultrasound beam intensities using infrared thermography-Experimental validation.
    Giridhar D; Robinson RA; Liu Y; Sliwa J; Zderic V; Myers MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4283-91. PubMed ID: 22712903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a fibre-optic hydrophone in measuring acoustic parameters of high power hyperthermia transducers.
    Chan HL; Chiang KS; Price DC; Gardner JL; Brinch J
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1609-22. PubMed ID: 2587628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic power measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound in medicine based on radiation force.
    Shou W; Huang X; Duan S; Xia R; Shi Z; Geng X; Li F
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e17-20. PubMed ID: 16860359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of effective radiating area, power, intensity, and field characteristics of ultrasound transducers.
    Johns LD; Straub SJ; Howard SM
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jan; 88(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 17207688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-Cost Thermochromic Quality Assurance Phantom for Therapeutic Ultrasound Devices: A Proof of Concept.
    Eames M; Larrabee Z; Hananel A; Padilla F; Aubry JF
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):269-277. PubMed ID: 36441031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Progress in developing a thermal method for measuring the output power of medical ultrasound transducers that exploits the pyroelectric effect.
    Zeqiri B; Zauhar G; Hodnett M; Barrie J
    Ultrasonics; 2011 May; 51(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 21163509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A thermal beam-shape phantom for ultrasound physiotherapy transducers.
    Martin K; Fernandez R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(8):1267-74. PubMed ID: 9372575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transducer modeling for accurate acoustic simulations of transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation.
    Pasquinelli C; Montanaro H; Lee HJ; Hanson LG; Kim H; Kuster N; Siebner HR; Neufeld E; Thielscher A
    J Neural Eng; 2020 Jul; 17(4):046010. PubMed ID: 32485690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.
    Zhou Y; Zhai L; Simmons R; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):676-85. PubMed ID: 16938956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integration of deployable fluid lenses and reflectors with endoluminal therapeutic ultrasound applicators: Preliminary investigations of enhanced penetration depth and focal gain.
    Adams MS; Salgaonkar VA; Scott SJ; Sommer G; Diederich CJ
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5339-5356. PubMed ID: 28681404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A convenient, reliable, and fast acoustic pressure field measurement method for magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound systems with phased array transducers.
    Kothapalli SVVN; Partanen A; Zhu L; Altman MB; Gach HM; Hallahan DE; Chen H
    J Ther Ultrasound; 2018; 6():5. PubMed ID: 29988649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two methods for determining ultrasonic intensity for medical transducers.
    Shombert DG; Robinson RA
    Ultrasonics; 1983 Sep; 21(5):234-6. PubMed ID: 6612895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A buoyancy method for the measurement of total ultrasound power generated by HIFU transducers.
    Shaw A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1327-42. PubMed ID: 18471952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.
    Wear KA; Shah A; Baker C
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Dec; 67(12):2674-2691. PubMed ID: 32746206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.