These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29438006)

  • 1. Statistics Refresher for Molecular Imaging Technologists, Part 2: Accuracy of Interpretation, Significance, and Variance.
    Farrell MB
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Jun; 46(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 29438006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement variability and confidence intervals in medicine: why should radiologists care?
    Medina LS; Zurakowski D
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):297-301. PubMed ID: 12563116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of analysis-of-variance-based methods to quantify the random variations of observers in medical imaging measurements: guidelines to the investigator.
    Zeggelink WF; Hart AA; Gilhuijs KG
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1996-2007. PubMed ID: 15305452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of a Standardized MR Imaging Approach in the Prediction of Small Renal Mass Histology.
    Kay FU; Canvasser NE; Xi Y; Pinho DF; Costa DN; Diaz de Leon A; Khatri G; Leyendecker JR; Yokoo T; Lay AH; Kavoussi N; Koseoglu E; Cadeddu JA; Pedrosa I
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):543-553. PubMed ID: 29390196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability studies of diagnostic tests are not using enough observers for robust estimation of interobserver agreement: a simulation study.
    Sadatsafavi M; Najafzadeh M; Lynd L; Marra C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 61(7):722-7. PubMed ID: 18486446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Descriptive Statistics: Reporting the Answers to the 5 Basic Questions of Who, What, Why, When, Where, and a Sixth, So What?
    Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Nov; 125(5):1797-1802. PubMed ID: 28891910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CAN'T MISS--conquer any number task by making important statistics simple. Part 3. Standard error, estimation, and confidence intervals.
    Hansen JP
    J Healthc Qual; 2003; 25(4):34-9. PubMed ID: 14606211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can't miss: conquer any number task by making important statistics simple. Part 6. Tests of statistical significance (z test statistic, rejecting the null hypothesis, p value), t test, z test for proportions, statistical significance versus meaningful difference.
    Hansen JP
    J Healthc Qual; 2004; 26(4):43-53. PubMed ID: 15352344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval estimation for a difference between intraclass kappa statistics.
    Donner A; Zou G
    Biometrics; 2002 Mar; 58(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 11890316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical inference by confidence intervals: issues of interpretation and utilization.
    Sim J; Reid N
    Phys Ther; 1999 Feb; 79(2):186-95. PubMed ID: 10029058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffusion-weighted MRI of breast lesions: a prospective clinical investigation of the quantitative imaging biomarker characteristics of reproducibility, repeatability, and diagnostic accuracy.
    Spick C; Bickel H; Pinker K; Bernathova M; Kapetas P; Woitek R; Clauser P; Polanec SH; Rudas M; Bartsch R; Helbich TH; Baltzer PA
    NMR Biomed; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1445-53. PubMed ID: 27553252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A robust statistic AC₁ for assessing inter-observer agreement in reliability studies].
    Nishiura H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2010 Nov; 66(11):1485-91. PubMed ID: 21099180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Changes in BI-RADS Density Assessment Guidelines (Fourth Versus Fifth Edition) on Breast Density Assessment: Intra- and Interreader Agreements and Density Distribution.
    Irshad A; Leddy R; Ackerman S; Cluver A; Pavic D; Abid A; Lewis MC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Dec; 207(6):1366-1371. PubMed ID: 27656766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The power of a statistical test. What does insignificance mean?
    Markel MD
    Vet Surg; 1991; 20(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 1853553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.
    Holmes AP; Blair RC; Watson JD; Ford I
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1996 Jan; 16(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 8530558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducibility of histomorphologic diagnoses with special reference to the kappa statistic.
    Svanholm H; Starklint H; Gundersen HJ; Fabricius J; Barlebo H; Olsen S
    APMIS; 1989 Aug; 97(8):689-98. PubMed ID: 2669853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Test Statistics of Nonnormal and Unbalanced Samples for Multivariate Analysis of Variance in terms of Type-I Error Rates.
    Ateş C; Kaymaz Ö; Kale HE; Tekindal MA
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():2173638. PubMed ID: 31396289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The kappa statistic in rehabilitation research: an examination.
    Tooth LR; Ottenbacher KJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Aug; 85(8):1371-6. PubMed ID: 15295769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.