These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29438006)

  • 21. Behavior and interpretation of the kappa statistic: resolution of the two paradoxes.
    Lantz CA; Nebenzahl E
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Apr; 49(4):431-4. PubMed ID: 8621993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Kappa statistic to measure agreement beyond chance in free-response assessments.
    Carpentier M; Combescure C; Merlini L; Perneger TV
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 28420347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Appropriate Statistics for Determining Chance-Removed Interpractitioner Agreement.
    Popplewell M; Reizes J; Zaslawski C
    J Altern Complement Med; 2019 Nov; 25(11):1115-1120. PubMed ID: 29851495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interobserver variability of carotid Doppler peak velocity measurements among technologists in an ICAVL-accredited vascular laboratory.
    Corriveau MM; Johnston KW
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Apr; 39(4):735-41. PubMed ID: 15071434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Good correlation of goutallier rating of supraspinatus fatty changes on axial and reformatted parasagittal computed tomographic images.
    Müller CT; Buck FM; Mamisch-Saupe N; Gerber C
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 24681856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.
    Algina J; Keselman HJ; Penfield RD
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Sep; 10(3):317-28. PubMed ID: 16221031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists.
    Nakagawa S; Cuthill IC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 Nov; 82(4):591-605. PubMed ID: 17944619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 5 ways statistics can fool you--tips for practicing clinicians.
    West CP; Dupras DM
    Vaccine; 2013 Mar; 31(12):1550-2. PubMed ID: 23246309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reliability and Accuracy of Cross-sectional Radiographic Assessment of Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: Role of Training and Experience.
    Klara K; Collins JE; Gurary E; Elman SA; Stenquist DS; Losina E; Katz JN
    J Rheumatol; 2016 Jul; 43(7):1421-6. PubMed ID: 27084912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Understanding the Difference Between Standard Deviation and Standard Error of the Mean, and Knowing When to Use Which.
    Andrade C
    Indian J Psychol Med; 2020 Jul; 42(4):409-410. PubMed ID: 33402813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the confidence interval confidently.
    Hazra A
    J Thorac Dis; 2017 Oct; 9(10):4125-4130. PubMed ID: 29268424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative evaluation of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on breast MRI. A feasibility study with a semi-automatic and automatic software compared to observer-based scores.
    Tagliafico A; Bignotti B; Tagliafico G; Tosto S; Signori A; Calabrese M
    Br J Radiol; 2015; 88(1056):20150417. PubMed ID: 26462852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate?
    Zapf A; Castell S; Morawietz L; Karch A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Aug; 16():93. PubMed ID: 27495131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intraclass correlations as estimates of interrater reliability in nursing research.
    Laschinger HK
    West J Nurs Res; 1992 Apr; 14(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 1561790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can't miss: conquer any number task by making important statistics simple. Part 5. Comparing two confidence intervals, standard error of the difference between two means and between two proportions.
    Hansen JP
    J Healthc Qual; 2004; 26(4):33-42. PubMed ID: 15352343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A non-iterative confidence interval estimating procedure for the intraclass kappa statistic with multinomial outcomes.
    Zou G; Klar N
    Biom J; 2005 Oct; 47(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 16385909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Typical error versus limits of agreement.
    Atkinson G; Nevill A
    Sports Med; 2000 Nov; 30(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 11103850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration using offline analysis of the transvaginal ultrasound 'sliding sign' technique: inter- and intra-observer reproducibility.
    Reid S; Lu C; Casikar I; Mein B; Magotti R; Ludlow J; Benzie R; Condous G
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1237-46. PubMed ID: 23482338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing biomarker measurements to a normal range: when to use standard error of the mean (SEM) or standard deviation (SD) confidence intervals tests.
    Pleil JD
    Biomarkers; 2016; 21(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 27045663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.