159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29438509)
1. DOSE DISTRIBUTION IN A BREAST UNDERGOING MAMMOGRAPHY BASED ON A 3D DETAILED BREAST MODEL FOR CHINESE WOMEN.
Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Feng Z; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Oct; 181(3):221-228. PubMed ID: 29438509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo calculation of conversion coefficients for dose estimation in mammography based on a 3D detailed breast model.
Wang W; Qiu R; Ren L; Liu H; Wu Z; Li C; Niu Y; Li J
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2503-2514. PubMed ID: 28295395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating energy deposition in glandular tissues for mammography using multiscale Monte Carlo simulations.
Oliver PAK; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 30657190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast dose in mammography is about 30% lower when realistic heterogeneous glandular distributions are considered.
Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6337-48. PubMed ID: 26520725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Muller S; Bloch I; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):342-5. PubMed ID: 25897143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Updated breast CT dose coefficients (DgN
Hernandez AM; Becker AE; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1455-1466. PubMed ID: 30661250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Homogeneous vs. patient specific breast models for Monte Carlo evaluation of mean glandular dose in mammography.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Bliznakova K; Sechopoulos I; Russo P
Phys Med; 2018 Jul; 51():56-63. PubMed ID: 29705184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Yi Y; Lai CJ; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Liu X; Ge S; You Z; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 21452696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Monte Carlo simulation of average glandular dose and an investigation of influencing factors.
Nigapruke K; Puwanich P; Phaisangittisakul N; Youngdee W
J Radiat Res; 2010; 51(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 20523013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normalized mean glandular dose computation from mammography using GATE: a validation study.
Myronakis ME; Zvelebil M; Darambara DG
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2247-65. PubMed ID: 23475310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Normalized glandular dose coefficients for digital breast tomosynthesis systems with a homogeneous breast model.
Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; Del Sarto D; Fantacci ME; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065024. PubMed ID: 33535193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiscale Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetry in x-ray breast imaging: Part I - Macroscopic scales.
Massera RT; Tomal A; Thomson RM
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 38156766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography.
Kelaranta A; Toroi P; Timonen M; Komssi S; Kortesniemi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):342-53. PubMed ID: 25114321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and dedicated breast CT.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Tucciariello RM; Bliznakova K; Russo P
Phys Med; 2018 Nov; 55():142-148. PubMed ID: 30314732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
