These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29438509)

  • 21. Comparisons of glandular breast dose between digital mammography, tomosynthesis and breast CT based on anthropomorphic patient-derived breast phantoms.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Bliznakova K; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2022 May; 97():50-58. PubMed ID: 35395535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Three dimensional dose distribution comparison of simple and complex acquisition trajectories in dedicated breast CT.
    Shah JP; Mann SD; McKinley RL; Tornai MP
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4497-510. PubMed ID: 26233179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Average glandular dose conversion coefficients for segmented breast voxel models.
    Zankl M; Fill U; Hoeschen C; Panzer W; Regulla D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):410-4. PubMed ID: 15933148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A survey of clinical factors and patient dose in mammography.
    Kruger RL; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2001 Jul; 28(7):1449-54. PubMed ID: 11488578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Radiation doses in volume-of-interest breast computed tomography--A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):3063-75. PubMed ID: 26127058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.
    Sechopoulos I; Suryanarayanan S; Vedantham S; D'Orsi C; Karellas A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):221-32. PubMed ID: 17278508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characterization of the homogeneous tissue mixture approximation in breast imaging dosimetry.
    Sechopoulos I; Bliznakova K; Qin X; Fei B; Feng SS
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5050-9. PubMed ID: 22894430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Determination of backscatter factors in breast tomosynthesis using MCNPX simulations and measurements.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Figueira C; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):325-30. PubMed ID: 25836681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Monte Carlo study of monoenergetic and polyenergetic normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients in mammography.
    Sarno A; Mettivier G; Di Lillo F; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 62(1):306-325. PubMed ID: 27991451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model.
    Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Russo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125012. PubMed ID: 31141793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mean glandular dose to patients from stereotactic breast biopsy procedures.
    Paixão L; Chevalier M; Hurtado-Romero AE; Garayoa J
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):145008. PubMed ID: 29877195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiation dose estimates based on Monte Carlo simulation for spiral breast computed tomography imaging in a large cohort of patients.
    Shim S; Kolditz D; Steiding C; Ruth V; Hoetker AM; Unkelbach J; Boss A
    Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2417-2428. PubMed ID: 36622370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of fibroglandular tissue distribution and breast shape in voxelized breast models for dosimetry in mammography.
    Ferrauche G; Tramontin G; Massera RT; Tomal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Mar; 68(7):. PubMed ID: 36827710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
    Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Monte Carlo simulation for correlation analysis of average glandular dose by breast thickness and glandular ratio in breast tissue.
    Kim ST; Cho JK
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 24704647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Geant4 physics list comparison for the simulation of phase-contrast mammography (XPulse project).
    Beaudoux V; Blin G; Barbrel B; Kantor G; Zacharatou C
    Phys Med; 2019 Apr; 60():66-75. PubMed ID: 31000088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
    Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
    Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-layer heterogeneous mammographic phantoms for Monte Carlo simulation of normalized glandular dose coefficients in mammography.
    Chang TY; Lai KJ; Tu CY; Wu J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2234. PubMed ID: 32042071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of mean glandular dose for mammography of augmented breasts.
    Beckett JR; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3241-52. PubMed ID: 11098901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calculating Individual Lifetime Effective Risk from Initial Mean Glandular Dose Arising from the First Screening Mammogram.
    M Ali R; England A; Mercer CE; Tootell A; Hogg P
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2018 Dec; 49(4):406-413. PubMed ID: 30514558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.