BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29439426)

  • 1. Special Protein Molecules Computational Identification.
    Zou Q; He W
    Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Feb; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 29439426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. idDock+: Integrating Machine Learning in Probabilistic Search for Protein-Protein Docking.
    Hashmi I; Shehu A
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):806-22. PubMed ID: 26222714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Protein Function Analysis through Machine Learning.
    Avery C; Patterson J; Grear T; Frater T; Jacobs DJ
    Biomolecules; 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36139085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated machine learning, molecular docking and 3D-QSAR based approach for identification of potential inhibitors of trypanosomal N-myristoyltransferase.
    Singh N; Shah P; Dwivedi H; Mishra S; Tripathi R; Sahasrabuddhe AA; Siddiqi MI
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Nov; 12(12):3711-3723. PubMed ID: 27766319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular Docking for Prediction and Interpretation of Adverse Drug Reactions.
    Luo H; Fokoue-Nkoutche A; Singh N; Yang L; Hu J; Zhang P
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2018; 21(5):314-322. PubMed ID: 29792141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting protein conformational changes for unbound and homology docking: learning from intrinsic and induced flexibility.
    Chen H; Sun Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):544-556. PubMed ID: 27862345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of MDockPP in CAPRI rounds 28-29 and 31-35 including the prediction of water-mediated interactions.
    Xu X; Qiu L; Yan C; Ma Z; Grinter SZ; Zou X
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):424-434. PubMed ID: 27802576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Machine learning in computational docking.
    Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
    Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computational studies of G protein-coupled receptor complexes: Structure and dynamics.
    Sensoy O; Almeida JG; Shabbir J; Moreira IS; Morra G
    Methods Cell Biol; 2017; 142():205-245. PubMed ID: 28964337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An improved approach for predicting drug-target interaction: proteochemometrics to molecular docking.
    Shaikh N; Sharma M; Garg P
    Mol Biosyst; 2016 Mar; 12(3):1006-14. PubMed ID: 26822863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulation of carbohydrates, from molecular docking to dynamics in water.
    Sapay N; Nurisso A; Imberty A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 924():469-83. PubMed ID: 23034760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accurate Prediction of Docked Protein Structure Similarity.
    Akbal-Delibas B; Pomplun M; Haspel N
    J Comput Biol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):892-904. PubMed ID: 26335807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pushing the Backbone in Protein-Protein Docking.
    Kuroda D; Gray JJ
    Structure; 2016 Oct; 24(10):1821-1829. PubMed ID: 27568930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SAnDReS a Computational Tool for Statistical Analysis of Docking Results and Development of Scoring Functions.
    Xavier MM; Heck GS; Avila MB; Levin NMB; Pintro VO; Carvalho NL; Azevedo WF
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2016; 19(10):801-812. PubMed ID: 27686428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro molecular machine learning algorithm via symmetric internal loops of DNA.
    Lee JH; Lee SH; Baek C; Chun H; Ryu JH; Kim JW; Deaton R; Zhang BT
    Biosystems; 2017 Aug; 158():1-9. PubMed ID: 28465242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Machine learning and docking models for Mycobacterium tuberculosis topoisomerase I.
    Ekins S; Godbole AA; Kéri G; Orfi L; Pato J; Bhat RS; Verma R; Bradley EK; Nagaraja V
    Tuberculosis (Edinb); 2017 Mar; 103():52-60. PubMed ID: 28237034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation on the effect of key water molecules on docking performance in CSARdock exercise.
    Kumar A; Zhang KY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1880-92. PubMed ID: 23617355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvements, trends, and new ideas in molecular docking: 2012-2013 in review.
    Yuriev E; Holien J; Ramsland PA
    J Mol Recognit; 2015 Oct; 28(10):581-604. PubMed ID: 25808539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Towards better modelling of drug-loading in solid lipid nanoparticles: Molecular dynamics, docking experiments and Gaussian Processes machine learning.
    Hathout RM; Metwally AA
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2016 Nov; 108():262-268. PubMed ID: 27449631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Protein Complex Similarity.
    Farhoodi R; Akbal-Delibas B; Haspel N
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 27748625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.