These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29439731)
21. Metagenomic profiling of the microbial freshwater communities in two Bulgarian reservoirs. Iliev I; Yahubyan G; Marhova M; Apostolova E; Gozmanova M; Gecheva G; Kostadinova S; Ivanova A; Baev V J Basic Microbiol; 2017 Aug; 57(8):669-679. PubMed ID: 28543439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Scalable metagenomics alignment research tool (SMART): a scalable, rapid, and complete search heuristic for the classification of metagenomic sequences from complex sequence populations. Lee AY; Lee CS; Van Gelder RN BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jul; 17():292. PubMed ID: 27465705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. NBZIMM: negative binomial and zero-inflated mixed models, with application to microbiome/metagenomics data analysis. Zhang X; Yi N BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Oct; 21(1):488. PubMed ID: 33126862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The gut mycobiome of the Human Microbiome Project healthy cohort. Nash AK; Auchtung TA; Wong MC; Smith DP; Gesell JR; Ross MC; Stewart CJ; Metcalf GA; Muzny DM; Gibbs RA; Ajami NJ; Petrosino JF Microbiome; 2017 Nov; 5(1):153. PubMed ID: 29178920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Genetic diversity of viable, injured, and dead fecal bacteria assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and 16S rRNA gene analysis. Ben-Amor K; Heilig H; Smidt H; Vaughan EE; Abee T; de Vos WM Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Aug; 71(8):4679-89. PubMed ID: 16085863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. ICoVeR - an interactive visualization tool for verification and refinement of metagenomic bins. Broeksema B; Calusinska M; McGee F; Winter K; Bongiovanni F; Goux X; Wilmes P; Delfosse P; Ghoniem M BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 18(1):233. PubMed ID: 28464793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A two-stage statistical procedure for feature selection and comparison in functional analysis of metagenomes. Pookhao N; Sohn MB; Li Q; Jenkins I; Du R; Jiang H; An L Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 25256572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Reconstructing 16S rRNA genes in metagenomic data. Yuan C; Lei J; Cole J; Sun Y Bioinformatics; 2015 Jun; 31(12):i35-43. PubMed ID: 26072503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics. Jonsson V; Ă–sterlund T; Nerman O; Kristiansson E BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():78. PubMed ID: 26810311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fast zero-inflated negative binomial mixed modeling approach for analyzing longitudinal metagenomics data. Zhang X; Yi N Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(8):2345-2351. PubMed ID: 31904815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pancreatic cyst fluid harbors a unique microbiome. Li S; Fuhler GM; Bn N; Jose T; Bruno MJ; Peppelenbosch MP; Konstantinov SR Microbiome; 2017 Nov; 5(1):147. PubMed ID: 29122007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The truth about metagenomics: quantifying and counteracting bias in 16S rRNA studies. Brooks JP; Edwards DJ; Harwich MD; Rivera MC; Fettweis JM; Serrano MG; Reris RA; Sheth NU; Huang B; Girerd P; ; Strauss JF; Jefferson KK; Buck GA BMC Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 15():66. PubMed ID: 25880246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]