451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29441568)
1. Evaluation of the benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of potential alternatives to iFOBT testing for colorectal cancer screening in Australia.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Sarfati D; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2018 Jul; 143(2):269-282. PubMed ID: 29441568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.
Worthington J; Lew JB; Feletto E; Holden CA; Worthley DL; Miller C; Canfell K
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0227899. PubMed ID: 32012174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term evaluation of benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia: a modelling study.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Xu XM; Greuter MJE; Caruana M; Cenin DR; He E; Saville M; Grogan P; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Lancet Public Health; 2017 Jul; 2(7):e331-e340. PubMed ID: 29253458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits, Harms, and Cost-Effectiveness of Potential Age Extensions to the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program in Australia.
Lew JB; St John DJB; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Ee HC; Jenkins MA; He E; Grogan P; Caruana M; Greuter MJE; Coupé VMH; Canfell K
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2018 Dec; 27(12):1450-1461. PubMed ID: 30190276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cancer screening in Australia: an overview of modelling estimates.
Lew JB; Feletto E; Wade S; Caruana M; Kang YJ; Nickson C; Simms KT; Procopio P; Taylor N; Worthington J; Smith D; Canfell K
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rescreening of persons with a negative colonoscopy result: results from a microsimulation model.
Knudsen AB; Hur C; Gazelle GS; Schrag D; McFarland EG; Kuntz KM
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Nov; 157(9):611-20. PubMed ID: 23128861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of computed tomographic colonography screening for colorectal cancer in the medicare population.
Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Savarino JE; van Ballegooijen M; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Aug; 102(16):1238-52. PubMed ID: 20664028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.
Vanness DJ; Knudsen AB; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Rutter CM; Gareen IF; Herman BA; Kuntz KM; Zauber AG; van Ballegooijen M; Feuer EJ; Chen MH; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 Nov; 261(2):487-98. PubMed ID: 21813740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening: comparison of community-based flexible sigmoidoscopy with fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy.
O'Leary BA; Olynyk JK; Neville AM; Platell CF
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 14675241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.
Sonnenberg A; Delcò F; Inadomi JM
Ann Intern Med; 2000 Oct; 133(8):573-84. PubMed ID: 11033584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programmes using sigmoidoscopy and immunochemical faecal occult blood test.
Senore C; Hassan C; Regge D; Pagano E; Iussich G; Correale L; Segnan N
J Med Screen; 2019 Jun; 26(2):76-83. PubMed ID: 30180780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of guaiac-based faecal occult blood testing, faecal immunochemical testing and flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Sharp L; Tilson L; Whyte S; O'Ceilleachair A; Walsh C; Usher C; Tappenden P; Chilcott J; Staines A; Barry M; Comber H
Br J Cancer; 2012 Feb; 106(5):805-16. PubMed ID: 22343624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Rutter CM; Naber SK; Doria-Rose VP; Pabiniak C; Johanson C; Fischer SE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuntz KM
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(23):2595-609. PubMed ID: 27305518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Family history-based colorectal cancer screening in Australia: A modelling study of the costs, benefits, and harms of different participation scenarios.
Dillon M; Flander L; Buchanan DD; Macrae FA; Emery JD; Winship IM; Boussioutas A; Giles GG; Hopper JL; Jenkins MA; Ait Ouakrim D
PLoS Med; 2018 Aug; 15(8):e1002630. PubMed ID: 30114221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer.
Barzi A; Lenz HJ; Quinn DI; Sadeghi S
Cancer; 2017 May; 123(9):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28117881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.
Lucidarme O; Cadi M; Berger G; Taieb J; Poynard T; Grenier P; Beresniak A
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1413-9. PubMed ID: 21444171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.
Patel SS; Kilgore ML
Cancer Control; 2015 Apr; 22(2):248-58. PubMed ID: 26068773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Innovative Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.
Peterse EFP; Meester RGS; de Jonge L; Omidvari AH; Alarid-Escudero F; Knudsen AB; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Feb; 113(2):154-161. PubMed ID: 32761199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.
Allameh Z; Davari M; Emami MH
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Mar; 14(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 21361717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Knudsen AB; Brenner H
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 20833348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
