These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29441759)

  • 1. Determinants Used to Justify the Strength of Recommendations among Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Shin ES; Jang JE; Yeon JY; Kim DS; Chang SG; Lee YS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2018 Feb; 33(8):e79. PubMed ID: 29441759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Above the GRADE: Evaluation of Guidelines in Critical Care Medicine.
    Sims CR; Warner MA; Stelfox HT; Hyder JA
    Crit Care Med; 2019 Jan; 47(1):109-113. PubMed ID: 30303840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.
    Brożek JL; Akl EA; Compalati E; Kreis J; Terracciano L; Fiocchi A; Ueffing E; Andrews J; Alonso-Coello P; Meerpohl JJ; Lang DM; Jaeschke R; Williams JW; Phillips B; Lethaby A; Bossuyt P; Glasziou P; Helfand M; Watine J; Afilalo M; Welch V; Montedori A; Abraha I; Horvath AR; Bousquet J; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ;
    Allergy; 2011 May; 66(5):588-95. PubMed ID: 21241318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of patient preferences in clinical practice guidelines: a multiple methods study using guidelines from oncology as a case.
    Gärtner FR; Portielje JE; Langendam M; Hairwassers D; Agoritsas T; Gijsen B; Liefers GJ; Pieterse AH; Stiggelbout AM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e032483. PubMed ID: 31811009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UpToDate adherence to GRADE criteria for strong recommendations: an analytical survey.
    Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Heen AF; Kristiansen A; Neumann I; Brito JP; Brignardello-Petersen R; Alexander PE; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Guyatt GH
    BMJ Open; 2017 Nov; 7(11):e018593. PubMed ID: 29150475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach.
    Neumann I; Santesso N; Akl EA; Rind DM; Vandvik PO; Alonso-Coello P; Agoritsas T; Mustafa RA; Alexander PE; Schünemann H; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 72():45-55. PubMed ID: 26772609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [GRADE system: classification of quality of evidence and strength of recommendation].
    Aguayo-Albasini JL; Flores-Pastor B; Soria-Aledo V
    Cir Esp; 2014 Feb; 92(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 24361098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of evidence underlying guidelines by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
    Brock CO; Blackwell SC; Chauhan SP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):223.e1-223.e10. PubMed ID: 32835718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
    Atkins D; Eccles M; Flottorp S; Guyatt GH; Henry D; Hill S; Liberati A; O'Connell D; Oxman AD; Phillips B; Schünemann H; Edejer TT; Vist GE; Williams JW;
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2004 Dec; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 15615589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strong recommendations from low certainty evidence: a cross-sectional analysis of a suite of national guidelines.
    Chong MC; Sharp MK; Smith SM; O'Neill M; Ryan M; Lynch R; Mahtani KR; Clyne B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar; 23(1):68. PubMed ID: 36966277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Integrative assessment of evidence in healthcare: the GRADE system].
    Schünemann H
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2009; 103(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 19645339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The GRADE system for classification of the level of evidence and grade of recommendations in clinical guideline reports.
    Oñate-Ocaña LF; Ochoa-Carrillo FJ
    Cir Cir; 2009; 77(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 19944034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD; Akl EA; Brozek JL; Montori VM; Heffner J; Hill S; Woodhead M; Campos-Outcalt D; Alderson P; Woitalla T; Puhan MA; Falck-Ytter Y; Bousquet J; Guyatt G;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 23256172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Support of personalized medicine through risk-stratified treatment recommendations - an environmental scan of clinical practice guidelines.
    Yu T; Vollenweider D; Varadhan R; Li T; Boyd C; Puhan MA
    BMC Med; 2013 Jan; 11():7. PubMed ID: 23302096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Introduction to the GRADE approach for guideline development: considerations for physical therapist practice.
    Austin TM; Richter RR; Sebelski CA
    Phys Ther; 2014 Nov; 94(11):1652-9. PubMed ID: 25035268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical practice guidelines: potential misconceptions of the GRADE approach.
    Watine J; Wils J; Augereau C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Jan; 67(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 24262768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Making the GRADE in anaphylaxis management: Toward recommendations integrating values, preferences, context, and shared decision making.
    Shaker MS; Oppenheimer J; Wallace DV; Golden DBK; Lang DM; ; ; Lang ES; Bernstein JA; Campbell RL; Chu D; Dinakar C; Ellis AK; Greenhawt M; Horner C; Lieberman JA; Rank MA; Stukus DR; Wang J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2020 Jun; 124(6):526-535.e2. PubMed ID: 32199979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Guidelines are made more transparent with the GRADE method: considerations for recommendations are explicit in the new method].
    Boluyt N; Rottier BL; Langendam MW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(25):A4379. PubMed ID: 22748366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classifying recommendations for clinical practice guidelines.
    American Academy of Pediatrics Steering Committee on Quality Improvement and Management
    Pediatrics; 2004 Sep; 114(3):874-7. PubMed ID: 15342869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and consistency of guidelines for the management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department.
    Tavender EJ; Bosch M; Green S; O'Connor D; Pitt V; Phillips K; Bragge P; Gruen RL
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Aug; 18(8):880-9. PubMed ID: 21843224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.