These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Rat choice in rapidly changing concurrent schedules. McLean AP; Grace RC; Shevchouk OT; Cording JR J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):313-335. PubMed ID: 29450892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts. Zentall TR; Roper KL; Sherburne LM J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 7714447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats. Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons. Leigland SM J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences. Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value. Schaal DW; Schuh KJ; Branch MN J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 1402602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers. Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies? Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrimination of response-reinforcer and response-stimulus contingencies in pigeons. Dodd PW J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 6699541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]