These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29442251)

  • 1. Adaptive learning and forgetting in an unconventional experimental routine.
    Bell-Garrison D; Rice NC; Kyonka EGE
    Anim Cogn; 2018 May; 21(3):315-329. PubMed ID: 29442251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Waiting in pigeons: the effects of daily intercalation on temporal discrimination.
    Wynne CD; Staddon JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Jul; 58(1):47-66. PubMed ID: 1645101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.
    Odum AL; Shahan TA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 16156137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acquisition of choice in concurrent chains: Assessing the cumulative decision model.
    Grace RC
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():82-93. PubMed ID: 27005579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.
    Davison MC; Hunter IW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):233-44. PubMed ID: 501273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental dynamics modulate covariation of choice and timing.
    Subramaniam S; Kyonka EG
    Behav Processes; 2016 Mar; 124():130-40. PubMed ID: 26802787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Delayed reinforcement and fixed-ratio performance.
    Jarmolowicz DP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 Nov; 100(3):370-95. PubMed ID: 24037852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeated, within-session resurgence.
    Cook JE; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 Jan; 111(1):28-47. PubMed ID: 30656711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rat choice in rapidly changing concurrent schedules.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Shevchouk OT; Cording JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Mar; 109(2):313-335. PubMed ID: 29450892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Most directed forgetting in pigeons can be attributed to the absence of reinforcement on forget trials during training or to other procedural artifacts.
    Zentall TR; Roper KL; Sherburne LM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 7714447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
    Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
    Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.
    Leigland SM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of briefly signaled delayed reinforcement: effects of variable-interval value.
    Schaal DW; Schuh KJ; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1992 Sep; 58(2):277-86. PubMed ID: 1402602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of response-reinforcer and response-stimulus contingencies in pigeons.
    Dodd PW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 6699541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.