These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29442360)

  • 21. How do task demands and aging affect lexical prediction during online reading of natural texts?
    Andrews S; Veldre A; Wong R; Yu L; Reichle ED
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Mar; 49(3):407-430. PubMed ID: 36521158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Single-Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty.
    van Schijndel M; Linzen T
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12988. PubMed ID: 34170031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dependency Resolution Difficulty Increases with Distance in Persian Separable Complex Predicates: Evidence for Expectation and Memory-Based Accounts.
    Safavi MS; Husain S; Vasishth S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():403. PubMed ID: 27064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sentence-final completion norms for 2925 Mexican Spanish sentence contexts.
    Angulo-Chavira AQ; Castellón-Flores AM; Ciria A; Arias-Trejo N
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):2486-2498. PubMed ID: 37407787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Structural Parsers and Neural Language Models as Surprisal Estimators.
    Oh BD; Clark C; Schuler W
    Front Artif Intell; 2022; 5():777963. PubMed ID: 35310956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill.
    Steen-Baker AA; Ng S; Payne BR; Anderson CJ; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EAL
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Aug; 32(5):460-472. PubMed ID: 28816473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.
    DeDe G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2589-2602. PubMed ID: 28863409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Role of Expectation and Working Memory Constraints in Hindi Comprehension: An Eye-tracking Corpus Analysis.
    Agrawal A; Agarwal S; Husain S
    J Eye Mov Res; 2017 Apr; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 33828649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Lexical Frequency and Sentence Context Influence the Brain's Response to Single Words.
    Huizeling E; Arana S; Hagoort P; Schoffelen JM
    Neurobiol Lang (Camb); 2022; 3(1):149-179. PubMed ID: 37215333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction During Natural Language Comprehension.
    Willems RM; Frank SL; Nijhof AD; Hagoort P; van den Bosch A
    Cereb Cortex; 2016 Jun; 26(6):2506-2516. PubMed ID: 25903464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A framework for modeling the interaction of syntactic processing and eye movement control.
    Engelmann F; Vasishth S; Engbert R; Kliegl R
    Top Cogn Sci; 2013 Jul; 5(3):452-74. PubMed ID: 23681560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Diving into a pool or volcano? Examining the influence of sentence context and task demands on sentence reading in younger and older adults.
    Haigh P; Hanif N; de Bruin A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279555. PubMed ID: 36584104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Investigating locality effects and surprisal in written English syntactic choice phenomena.
    Rajkumar R; van Schijndel M; White M; Schuler W
    Cognition; 2016 Oct; 155():204-232. PubMed ID: 27428810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Locality and expectation effects in Hindi preverbal constituent ordering.
    Ranjan S; Rajkumar R; Agarwal S
    Cognition; 2022 Jun; 223():104959. PubMed ID: 35091261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.
    Schotter ER; Bicknell K; Howard I; Levy R; Rayner K
    Cognition; 2014 Apr; 131(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 24434024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. It's Harder to Break a Relationship When you Commit Long.
    Arai M; Nakamura C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156482. PubMed ID: 27271881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
    Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.