These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29443407)

  • 1. Implanted vascular access device options: a focused review on safety and outcomes.
    Blanco-Guzman MO
    Transfusion; 2018 Feb; 58 Suppl 1():558-568. PubMed ID: 29443407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Infection of totally implantable venous access devices: A review of the literature.
    Pinelli F; Cecero E; Degl'Innocenti D; Selmi V; Giua R; Villa G; Chelazzi C; Romagnoli S; Pittiruti M
    J Vasc Access; 2018 May; 19(3):230-242. PubMed ID: 29512430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K; Ali M; Sidloff D; Kenningham RR; Ahmed S
    J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The "Arm-to-Chest Tunneling" technique: A modified technique for arm placement of implantable ports or central catheters.
    Kehagias E; Tsetis D
    J Vasc Access; 2019 Nov; 20(6):771-777. PubMed ID: 30939969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retrospective evaluation of totally implantable venous access port devices: early and late complications.
    Gurkan S; Seber S; Gur O; Yetisyigit T; Okan Donbaloglu M; Ozkaramanli Gur D
    J BUON; 2015; 20(1):338-45. PubMed ID: 25778336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices: A Review of Complications and Management Strategies.
    Tabatabaie O; Kasumova GG; Eskander MF; Critchlow JF; Tawa NE; Tseng JF
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2017 Feb; 40(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 28106685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of vascular access devices.
    Hadaway LC
    Semin Oncol Nurs; 1995 Aug; 11(3):154-66. PubMed ID: 7481143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polyurethane versus silicone catheters for central venous port devices implanted at the forearm.
    Wildgruber M; Lueg C; Borgmeyer S; Karimov I; Braun U; Kiechle M; Meier R; Koehler M; Ettl J; Berger H
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 May; 59():113-124. PubMed ID: 27023050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Placement and management of long-term central venous access catheters and ports.
    Denny DF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Aug; 161(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 8333382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Principles of subcutaneous port placement.
    Gonda SJ; Li R
    Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Dec; 14(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 22099011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Advanced central venous access. Selection, catheters, devices, and nursing management.
    Camp-Sorrell D
    J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(6):361-70. PubMed ID: 2243309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
    Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
    Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.
    Groeger JS; Lucas AB; Thaler HT; Friedlander-Klar H; Brown AE; Kiehn TE; Armstrong D
    Ann Intern Med; 1993 Dec; 119(12):1168-74. PubMed ID: 8239247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do central venous catheters have advantages over arteriovenous fistulas or grafts?
    Quarello F; Forneris G; Borca M; Pozzato M
    J Nephrol; 2006; 19(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 16874685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Port device central venous access in children with chronic renal disease--personal experience].
    Szczepańska M; Szprynger K; Stoksik P; Morawiec-Knysak A; Adamczyk P; Ziora K; Oswiecimska J
    Wiad Lek; 2006; 59(11-12):814-8. PubMed ID: 17427497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The mystery of the occluded port that allowed blood withdrawal: is it safe to use standard needles to access ports? A case report and literature review.
    Cataldo R; Costa F; Vitiello M; Brescia F; Proscia P; Falco C; Carassiti M
    J Surg Oncol; 2014 Apr; 109(5):500-3. PubMed ID: 24310214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Centrally inserted external catheters and totally implantable ports for the delivery of chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of device-related complications.
    Kulkarni S; Wu O; Kasthuri R; Moss JG
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2014 Aug; 37(4):990-1008. PubMed ID: 24218174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications).
    Pittiruti M; Hamilton H; Biffi R; MacFie J; Pertkiewicz M;
    Clin Nutr; 2009 Aug; 28(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 19464090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Future dimensions in vascular access--peripheral implantable ports.
    McKee J
    J Intraven Nurs; 1991; 14(6):387-93. PubMed ID: 1748920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.