These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 294441)

  • 1. Complex primary molar restorations using a composite resins. (A 42-month study using amalgam as comparative material).
    Morris ME; Barkin PR; Soelberg KB; Weis RW
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1979 Feb; 7(2):39-42. PubMed ID: 294441
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars.
    Tonn EM; Ryge G; Chambers DW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1980; 47(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 7002965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of Class II combined amalgam-composite restorations in primary molars after 6 to 30 months.
    Holan G; Chosack A; Eidelman E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 8958346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simplified and rapid treatment of ankylosed primary molars with an amalgam and composite resin.
    Bonin M
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1976; 43(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 773976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars--a three year clinical evaluation.
    Ostlund J; Möller K; Koch G
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(3):81-6. PubMed ID: 1496459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conservative interproximal box-only polyacid modified composite restorations in primary molars, twelve-month clinical results.
    Marks LA; van Amerongen WE; Kreulen CM; Weerheijm KL; Martens LC
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1999; 66(1):23-9, 12. PubMed ID: 10360200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG; Curzon ME; Fairpo CG
    Pediatr Dent; 1994; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time required for placement of composite versus amalgam restorations.
    Dilley DC; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Crisp RM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 2345211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified cavity preparations for composite resins in primary molars.
    Paquette DE; Vann WF; Oldenburg TR; Leinfelder KF
    Pediatr Dent; 1983 Dec; 5(4):246-51. PubMed ID: 6587327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Restoration of deciduous teeth].
    Jünke J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1976 Jun; 31(6):484-7. PubMed ID: 1066232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
    Olmez A; Ulusu T
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Materials and techniques for restoration of primary molars by pediatric dentists in Florida.
    Guelmann M; Mjör IA
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12212875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage of class 2 Superbond-lined composite restorations with and without a cervical amalgam base.
    Hovav S; Holan G; Lewinstein I; Fuks AB
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 8700773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite in Class II restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    García-Godoy F
    Acta Odontol Pediatr; 1984 Jun; 5(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 6598739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of composite and amalgam in posterior teeth of children.
    Oldenburg TR; Vann WF; Dilley DC
    Dent Mater; 1987 Aug; 3(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 3481593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars.
    Croll TP; Helpin ML
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1995; 62(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 7775678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A thirty months clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin in primary molars.
    Cunha RF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 11314318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restorative material for children's teeth: preferences of parents and children.
    Peretz B; Ram D
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(3):243-8, 233. PubMed ID: 12613305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.