These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29444116)

  • 41. Randomized Controlled Trial of the ShangRing for Adult Medical Male Circumcision: Safety, Effectiveness, and Acceptability of Using 7 Versus 14 Device Sizes.
    Feldblum PJ; Zulu R; Linyama D; Long S; Nonde TJ; Lai JJ; Kashitala J; Veena V; Kasonde P
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S30-5. PubMed ID: 27331587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A systems-based assessment of the PrePex device adverse events active surveillance system in Zimbabwe.
    Adamson PC; Tafuma TA; Davis SM; Xaba S; Herman-Roloff A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0190055. PubMed ID: 29272320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Safety and Acceptability of the PrePex Device When Used in Routine Male Circumcision Service Delivery During Active Surveillance in Zimbabwe.
    Mavhu W; Hatzold K; Ncube G; Xaba S; Madidi N; Keatinge J; Dhodho E; Samkange CA; Tshimanga M; Mangwiro T; Mugurungi O; Njeuhmeli E; Cowan FM
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S63-8. PubMed ID: 27331593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Safety, Procedure Time, and Cost of the PrePex™ Device to Forceps Guided Surgical Circumcision in Zimbabwe.
    Tshimanga M; Mangwiro T; Mugurungi O; Xaba S; Murwira M; Kasprzyk D; Montaño DE; Nyamukapa D; Tambashe B; Chatikobo P; Gundidza P; Gwinji G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0156220. PubMed ID: 27227679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Early Infant Male Circumcision in Cameroon and Senegal: Demand, Service Provision, and Cultural Context.
    Kenu E; Sint TT; Kamenga C; Ekpini R
    Glob Health Sci Pract; 2016 Jul; 4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-28. PubMed ID: 27413080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The safety profile and acceptability of a disposable male circumcision device in Kenyan men undergoing voluntary medical male circumcision.
    Musau P; Demirelli M; Muraguri N; Ndwiga F; Wainaina D; Ali NA
    J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1923-7. PubMed ID: 21944096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Penile measurements in Tanzanian males: guiding circumcision device design and supply forecasting.
    Chrouser K; Bazant E; Jin L; Kileo B; Plotkin M; Adamu T; Curran K; Koshuma S
    J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):544-50. PubMed ID: 23473900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lander J; Brady-Fryer B; Metcalfe JB; Nazarali S; Muttitt S
    JAMA; 1997 Dec 24-31; 278(24):2157-62. PubMed ID: 9417009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Safety Profile of PrePex Male Circumcision Device and Client Satisfaction With Adolescent Males Aged 13-17 Years in Zimbabwe.
    Tshimanga M; Hatzold K; Mugurungi O; Mangwiro T; Ncube G; Xaba S; Chatikobo P; Gundidza P; Samkange C; Dhlamini R; Murwira M; Gwinji G
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-42. PubMed ID: 27331588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Rapid, minimally invasive adult voluntary male circumcision: a randomised trial of Unicirc, a novel disposable device.
    Millard PS; Wilson HR; Goldstuck ND; Anaso C
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Nov; 104(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 24388090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Time to complete wound healing in HIV-positive and HIV-negative men following medical male circumcision in Kisumu, Kenya: a prospective cohort study.
    Rogers JH; Odoyo-June E; Jaoko W; Bailey RC
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61725. PubMed ID: 23613918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Safety and Efficacy of the PrePex Male Circumcision Device: Results From Pilot Implementation Studies in Mozambique, South Africa, and Zambia.
    Feldblum P; Martinson N; Bvulani B; Taruberekera N; Mahomed M; Chintu N; Milovanovic M; Hart C; Billy S; Necochea E; Samona A; Mhazo M; Bossemeyer D; Lai JJ; Lebinai L; Ashengo TA; Macaringue L; Veena V; Hatzold K
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2016 Jun; 72 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S43-8. PubMed ID: 27331589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Efficacy of knowledge and competence-based training of non-physicians in the provision of early infant male circumcision using the Mogen clamp in Rakai, Uganda.
    Kankaka EN; Kigozi G; Kayiwa D; Kighoma N; Makumbi F; Murungi T; Nabukalu D; Nampijja R; Watya S; Namuguzi D; Nalugoda F; Nakigozi G; Serwadda D; Wawer M; Gray RH
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):631-637. PubMed ID: 27753243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A prospective cohort study of safety and patient satisfaction of voluntary medical male circumcision in Botswana.
    Wirth KE; Semo BW; Spees LP; Ntsuape C; Barnhart S; Ledikwe JH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0185904. PubMed ID: 29112959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sexual Satisfaction, Performance, and Partner Response Following Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in Zambia: The Spear and Shield Project.
    Zulu R; Jones D; Chitalu N; Cook R; Weiss S
    Glob Health Sci Pract; 2015 Dec; 3(4):606-18. PubMed ID: 26681707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Simplifying the ShangRing technique for circumcision in boys and men: use of the no-flip technique with randomization to removal at 7 days versus spontaneous detachment.
    Barone MA; Li PS; Lee RK; Ouma D; Oundo M; Barasa M; Oketch J; Otiende P; Nyangweso N; Maina M; Kiswi N; Chirchir B; Goldstein M; Awori QD
    Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(4):324-331. PubMed ID: 30520424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The GoMo study: a randomized clinical trial assessing neonatal pain with Gomco vs Mogen clamp circumcision.
    Sinkey RG; Eschenbacher MA; Walsh PM; Doerger RG; Lambers DS; Sibai BM; Habli MA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):664.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25794628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: delayed removal leads to detachment.
    Barone MA; Awori QD; Li PS; Simba RO; Weaver MA; Okech JO; Aduda AO; Cherutich P; Muraguri N; Wekesa JM; Nyanchoka J; Perchal P; Masson P; Lee R; Goldstein M; Kioko J; Lusi O; Sokal DC
    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2012 Jul; 60(3):e82-9. PubMed ID: 22343180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. No-needle, single-visit adult male circumcision with Unicirc: a multi-centre field trial.
    Millard PS; Goldstuck ND
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0121686. PubMed ID: 25822727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of the penile microbiome in infant male circumcision: Mogen clamp versus Shangring.
    Salazar JE; Park DE; Punjani N; Pham T; Aziz M; Kigozi G; Gray RH; Kiboneka SD; Goldstein M; Li PS; Lee R; Liu CM
    EBioMedicine; 2024 Jul; 105():105216. PubMed ID: 38924841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.