BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29444315)

  • 21. Dosimetry and adequacy of CT-based attenuation correction for pediatric PET: phantom study.
    Fahey FH; Palmer MR; Strauss KJ; Zimmerman RE; Badawi RD; Treves ST
    Radiology; 2007 Apr; 243(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 17293575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of head size∕shape, miscentering, and bowtie filter on peak patient tissue doses from modern brain perfusion 256-slice CT: how can we minimize the risk for deterministic effects?
    Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011911. PubMed ID: 23298102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validation of calculation algorithms for organ doses in CT by measurements on a 5 year old paediatric phantom.
    Dabin J; Mencarelli A; McMillan D; Romanyukha A; Struelens L; Lee C
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jun; 61(11):4168-82. PubMed ID: 27192093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Organ dose and inherent uncertainty in helical CT dosimetry due to quasiperiodic dose distributions.
    Winslow JF; Tien CJ; Hintenlang DE
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3177-85. PubMed ID: 21815392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical note: estimating absorbed doses to the thyroid in CT.
    Huda W; Magill D; Spampinato MV
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3108-13. PubMed ID: 21815384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effective dose in X-ray examinations: comparison between spiral CT and urography in the study of renal colic].
    De Denaro M; Bregant P; Cupardo F; De Guarrini F; Rimondini A; Pozzi Mucelli R
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):256-61. PubMed ID: 11740454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Discrepancy between absorbed dose estimated from phantom measurements and from estimates using data on individual head sizes in head CT examinations.
    Adliene D; Mockeviciene S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20167791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development and validation of a practical lower-dose-simulation tool for optimizing computed tomography scan protocols.
    Yu L; Shiung M; Jondal D; McCollough CH
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(4):477-87. PubMed ID: 22805680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A film dosimetry system for use in computed tomography.
    Dixon RL; Ekstrand KE
    Radiology; 1978 Apr; 127(1):255-8. PubMed ID: 635194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Novel pregnant model phantoms for measurement of foetal radiation dose in x-ray examinations.
    Matsunaga Y; Haba T; Kobayashi M; Suzuki S; Asada Y; Chida K
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Aug; 41(3):. PubMed ID: 34233314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of organ doses in adult and paediatric CT examinations based on Monte Carlo simulations and in-phantom dosimetry.
    Fujii K; Nomura K; Muramatsu Y; Takahashi K; Obara S; Akahane K; Satake M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):166-71. PubMed ID: 25848103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Simple method of setting proper exposure in X-ray CT examination of head and abdomen].
    Kondo Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Apr; 61(4):514-20. PubMed ID: 15855874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Influence of phantom diameter, kVp and scan mode upon computed tomography dose index.
    Nickoloff EL; Dutta AK; Lu ZF
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12674240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patient-size-dependent radiation dose optimisation technique for abdominal CT examinations.
    Ngaile JE; Msaki P; Kazema R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jan; 148(2):189-201. PubMed ID: 21357583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations.
    Nishizawa K; Mori S; Ohno M; Yanagawa N; Yoshida T; Akahane K; Iwai K; Wada S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 128(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 17595212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reduction of eye lens radiation dose by orbital bismuth shielding in pediatric patients undergoing CT of the head: a Monte Carlo study.
    Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1024-30. PubMed ID: 15895586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. WAZA-ARI: computational dosimetry system for X-ray CT examinations. I. Radiation transport calculation for organ and tissue doses evaluation using JM phantom.
    Takahashi F; Sato K; Endo A; Ono K; Yoshitake T; Hasegawa T; Katsunuma Y; Ban N; Kai M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jul; 146(1-3):241-3. PubMed ID: 21493598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fetal radiation dose in three common CT examinations during pregnancy - Monte Carlo study.
    Kelaranta A; Mäkelä T; Kaasalainen T; Kortesniemi M
    Phys Med; 2017 Nov; 43():199-206. PubMed ID: 28941740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A study of the short- to long-phantom dose ratios for CT scanning without table translation.
    Li X; Zhang D; Yang J; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091912. PubMed ID: 25186399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.