These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29444445)

  • 1. Individual differences in the processing of referential dependencies: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Fiorentino R; Covey L; Gabriele A
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Apr; 673():79-84. PubMed ID: 29444445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interplay between referential processing and local syntactic/semantic processing: ERPs to written Chinese discourse.
    Yu J; Zhang Y; Boland JE; Cai L
    Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 1597():139-58. PubMed ID: 25511994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Referential processing in the human brain: An Event-Related Potential (ERP) study.
    Barkley C; Kluender R; Kutas M
    Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 1629():143-59. PubMed ID: 26456801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Event-Related Potentials Accompanying Processing Referentially Ambiguous Pronouns in Russian].
    Yurchenko AN; Fedorova OV; Kurgansky AV; Machinskaya RI
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2016 Sep; 66(5):590-599. PubMed ID: 30695404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia.
    Kuperberg GR; Ditman T; Choi Perrachione A
    Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging; 2018 Jan; 3(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 29397083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to Referential Ambiguity in Discourse: The Role of Attention, Working Memory, and Verbal Ability.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Traxler MJ; Lesh TA; Dave S; Mangun GR; Carter CS; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 27(12):2309-23. PubMed ID: 26401815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age-related differences in understanding pronominal reference in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation.
    Lee CL; Lai CH
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):275-287. PubMed ID: 37650796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ERPs reveal sensitivity to hypothetical contexts in spoken discourse.
    Dwivedi VD; Drury JE; Molnar M; Phillips NA; Baum S; Steinhauer K
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(11):791-5. PubMed ID: 20574414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in verbal working memory underlie a tradeoff between semantic and structural processing difficulty during language comprehension: An ERP investigation.
    Kim AE; Oines L; Miyake A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Mar; 44(3):406-420. PubMed ID: 28933902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():42-51. PubMed ID: 24911918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Lang; 2008 Aug; 106(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 18556057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension.
    Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: evidence from ERPs.
    Nieuwland MS; Van Berkum JJ
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 16956594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human language comprehension: an individual differences approach.
    Bornkessel ID; Fiebach CJ; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 15325409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: evidence from German and Dutch.
    Lamers MJ; Jansma BM; Hammer A; Münte TF
    BMC Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 7():23. PubMed ID: 16526952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sentence Processing in Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence From the P600.
    Key-DeLyria SE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 59(4):759-71. PubMed ID: 27387526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Topic shift impairs pronoun resolution during sentence comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Xu X; Zhou X
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Feb; 53(2):129-42. PubMed ID: 26592503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Processing pronouns without antecedents: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Filik R; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18284347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of gender information in pronoun resolution: evidence from Chinese.
    Qiu L; Swaab TY; Chen HC; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36156. PubMed ID: 22615754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Literature reading modulates pronoun resolution in counterfactual world: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Dai H; Chen L; Ni C; Xu X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):904-919. PubMed ID: 30010358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.