These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29445844)

  • 1. Accuracy of genomic selection to predict maize single-crosses obtained through different mating designs.
    Fritsche-Neto R; Akdemir D; Jannink JL
    Theor Appl Genet; 2018 May; 131(5):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 29445844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection.
    Schopp P; Riedelsheimer C; Utz HF; Schön CC; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Nov; 128(11):2189-201. PubMed ID: 26231985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimization of training sets for genomic prediction of early-stage single crosses in maize.
    Kadam DC; Rodriguez OR; Lorenz AJ
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Feb; 134(2):687-699. PubMed ID: 33398385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximizing efficiency of genomic selection in CIMMYT's tropical maize breeding program.
    Atanda SA; Olsen M; Burgueño J; Crossa J; Dzidzienyo D; Beyene Y; Gowda M; Dreher K; Zhang X; Prasanna BM; Tongoona P; Danquah EY; Olaoye G; Robbins KR
    Theor Appl Genet; 2021 Jan; 134(1):279-294. PubMed ID: 33037897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic prediction across years in a maize doubled haploid breeding program to accelerate early-stage testcross testing.
    Wang N; Wang H; Zhang A; Liu Y; Yu D; Hao Z; Ilut D; Glaubitz JC; Gao Y; Jones E; Olsen M; Li X; San Vicente F; Prasanna BM; Crossa J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Zhang X
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Oct; 133(10):2869-2879. PubMed ID: 32607592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diallel and prediction (REML/BLUP) for yield components in intervarietal maize hybrids.
    Carvalho IR; de Pelegrin AJ; Szareski VJ; Ferrari M; da Rosa TC; Martins TS; Dos Santos NL; Nardino M; de Souza VQ; de Oliveira AC; da Maia LC
    Genet Mol Res; 2017 Aug; 16(3):. PubMed ID: 28873210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genomic prediction for hastening and improving efficiency of forward selection in conifer polycross mating designs: an example from white spruce.
    Lenz PRN; Nadeau S; Azaiez A; Gérardi S; Deslauriers M; Perron M; Isabel N; Beaulieu J; Bousquet J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Apr; 124(4):562-578. PubMed ID: 31969718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genomic breeding value prediction for simple maize hybrid yield using total effects of associated markers, under different imbalance levels and environments.
    Cantelmo NF; Von Pinho RG; Balestre M
    Genet Mol Res; 2016 Mar; 15(1):15017232. PubMed ID: 26985952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction of hybrid performance: comparison of the efficiency of factorial and tester designs used as training sets in a multiparental connected reciprocal design for maize silage.
    Lorenzi A; Bauland C; Mary-Huard T; Pin S; Palaffre C; Guillaume C; Lehermeier C; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2022 Sep; 135(9):3143-3160. PubMed ID: 35918515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations.
    Zhao Y; Gowda M; Liu W; Würschum T; Maurer HP; Longin FH; Ranc N; Reif JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2012 Mar; 124(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 22075809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of maize double-cross hybrids using the best linear unbiased prediction with microsatellite marker information.
    Balestre M; Von Pinho RG; Souza JC
    Genet Mol Res; 2011 Jan; 10(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 21264813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revisiting hybrid breeding designs using genomic predictions: simulations highlight the superiority of incomplete factorials between segregating families over topcross designs.
    Seye AI; Bauland C; Charcosset A; Moreau L
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Jun; 133(6):1995-2010. PubMed ID: 32185420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.
    Riedelsheimer C; Endelman JB; Stange M; Sorrells ME; Jannink JL; Melchinger AE
    Genetics; 2013 Jun; 194(2):493-503. PubMed ID: 23535384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic Prediction Within and Across Biparental Families: Means and Variances of Prediction Accuracy and Usefulness of Deterministic Equations.
    Schopp P; Müller D; Wientjes YCJ; Melchinger AE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Nov; 7(11):3571-3586. PubMed ID: 28916649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II.
    Wang X; Li L; Yang Z; Zheng X; Yu S; Xu C; Hu Z
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Mar; 118(3):302-310. PubMed ID: 27649618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Small ad hoc versus large general training populations for genomewide selection in maize biparental crosses.
    Brandariz SP; Bernardo R
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Feb; 132(2):347-353. PubMed ID: 30390129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits in an Allogamous Annual Crop: The Case of Maize Single-Cross Hybrids.
    Martins Oliveira IC; Bernardeli A; Soler Guilhen JH; Pastina MM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2467():543-567. PubMed ID: 35451790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel strategies for genomic prediction of untested single-cross maize hybrids using unbalanced historical data.
    Dias KOG; Piepho HP; Guimarães LJM; Guimarães PEO; Parentoni SN; Pinto MO; Noda RW; Magalhães JV; Guimarães CT; Garcia AAF; Pastina MM
    Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Feb; 133(2):443-455. PubMed ID: 31758202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids. IV. Number versus size of crosses and importance of parental selection in two-stage selection for testcross performance.
    Wegenast T; Longin CF; Utz HF; Melchinger AE; Maurer HP; Reif JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2008 Jul; 117(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 18438638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal Designs for Genomic Selection in Hybrid Crops.
    Guo T; Yu X; Li X; Zhang H; Zhu C; Flint-Garcia S; McMullen MD; Holland JB; Szalma SJ; Wisser RJ; Yu J
    Mol Plant; 2019 Mar; 12(3):390-401. PubMed ID: 30625380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.