BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29446191)

  • 1. Speech understanding in noise in elderly adults: the effect of inhibitory control and syntactic complexity.
    van Knijff EC; Coene M; Govaerts PJ
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2018 May; 53(3):628-642. PubMed ID: 29446191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity.
    Wingfield A; McCoy SL; Peelle JE; Tun PA; Cox LC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006; 17(7):487-97. PubMed ID: 16927513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.
    Coene M; Krijger S; Meeuws M; De Ceulaer G; Govaerts PJ
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():7249848. PubMed ID: 27830152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of stimulus and noise rate variability on speech perception by younger and older adults.
    Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Apr; 115(4):1808-17. PubMed ID: 15101658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Noise Level and Cognitive Function on Speech Perception in Normal Elderly and Elderly with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.
    Lee SJ; Park KW; Kim LS; Kim H
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2016 Jun; 29(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 27336804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Noise-Vocoded Sentence Recognition and the Use of Context in Older and Younger Adult Listeners.
    Moberly AC; Varadarajan VV; Tamati TN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):365-381. PubMed ID: 36475738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?
    Uslar V; Ruigendijk E; Hamann C; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Sep; 50(9):621-31. PubMed ID: 21714708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cognitive Function Prediction of Performance During Dual-Tasks Across Adults With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Harvey J; Seeman S; von Hapsburg D
    Curr Aging Sci; 2018; 11(3):155-164. PubMed ID: 30543178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.
    Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing.
    Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is Having Hearing Loss Fundamentally Different? Multigroup Structural Equation Modeling of the Effect of Cognitive Functioning on Speech Identification.
    Marsja E; Stenbäck V; Moradi S; Danielsson H; Rönnberg J
    Ear Hear; 2022 Sep-Oct 01; 43(5):1437-1446. PubMed ID: 34983896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When Hearing Does Not Mean Understanding: On the Neural Processing of Syntactically Complex Sentences by Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Vogelzang M; Thiel CM; Rosemann S; Rieger JW; Ruigendijk E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jan; 64(1):250-262. PubMed ID: 33400550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults' report accuracy for verbal materials.
    Stewart R; Wingfield A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 19927677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory-frontal Channeling in α and β Bands is Altered by Age-related Hearing Loss and Relates to Speech Perception in Noise.
    Price CN; Alain C; Bidelman GM
    Neuroscience; 2019 Dec; 423():18-28. PubMed ID: 31705894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.