416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29446319)
1. Dual-energy CT iodine maps as an alternative quantitative imaging biomarker to abdominal CT perfusion: determination of appropriate trigger delays for acquisition using bolus tracking.
Skornitzke S; Fritz F; Mayer P; Koell M; Hansen J; Pahn G; Hackert T; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170351. PubMed ID: 29446319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Correlation of quantitative dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps and abdominal computed tomography perfusion measurements: are single-acquisition dual-energy computed tomography iodine maps more than a reduced-dose surrogate of conventional computed tomography perfusion?
Stiller W; Skornitzke S; Fritz F; Klauss M; Hansen J; Pahn G; Grenacher L; Kauczor HU
Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):703-8. PubMed ID: 26039774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring Dynamic CT Perfusion Based on Time-Resolved Quantitative DECT Iodine Maps: Comparison to Conventional Perfusion at 80 kVp for Pancreatic Carcinoma.
Skornitzke S; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Invest Radiol; 2019 Nov; 54(11):689-696. PubMed ID: 31335633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of optimal acquisition delays of DECT iodine maps in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A potential alternative to the Patlak model of CT perfusion.
Skornitzke S; Mayer P; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e14726. PubMed ID: 37064458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of dynamic DECT acquisitions for calculation of perfusion maps of blood flow: Quantitative comparison to conventional, dynamic 80 kV
Skornitzke S; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109262. PubMed ID: 32942200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Iodine Parameters in Triple-Bolus Dual-Energy CT Correlate With Perfusion CT Biomarkers of Angiogenesis in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Manoharan D; Netaji A; Das CJ; Sharma S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):808-816. PubMed ID: 32069083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Can dual-energy CT replace perfusion CT for the functional evaluation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma?
Mulé S; Pigneur F; Quelever R; Tenenhaus A; Baranes L; Richard P; Tacher V; Herin E; Pasquier H; Ronot M; Rahmouni A; Vilgrain V; Luciani A
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 29168007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual-energy perfusion-CT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Klauss M; Stiller W; Pahn G; Fritz F; Kieser M; Werner J; Kauczor HU; Grenacher L
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Feb; 82(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 23062281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing dual energy CT and subtraction CT on a phantom: which one provides the best contrast in iodine maps for sub-centimetre details?
Baerends E; Oostveen LJ; Smit CT; Das M; Sechopoulos I; Brink M; de Lange F; Prokop M
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5051-5059. PubMed ID: 29808430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can quantitative iodine parameters on DECT replace perfusion CT parameters in colorectal cancers?
Kang HJ; Kim SH; Bae JS; Jeon SK; Han JK
Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4775-4782. PubMed ID: 29789907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications.
Karçaaltıncaba M; Aktaş A
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Sep; 17(3):181-94. PubMed ID: 20945292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dual-Energy CT Urography With 50% Reduced Iodine Dose Versus Single-Energy CT Urography With Standard Iodine Dose.
Shuman WP; Mileto A; Busey JM; Desai N; Koprowicz KM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 30422713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between Dual-Energy and Perfusion CT in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Gordic S; Puippe GD; Krauss B; Klotz E; Desbiolles L; Lesurtel M; Müllhaupt B; Pfammatter T; Alkadhi H
Radiology; 2016 Jul; 280(1):78-87. PubMed ID: 26824712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Use of low-dose whole pancreatic CT perfusion and individualized dual-energy CT scanning.
Li HO; Guo J; Sun C; Li X; Qi YD; Wang XM; Xu ZD; Chen JH; Liu C
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 59(5):590-8. PubMed ID: 26223707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality of mean temporal arterial and mean temporal portal venous phase images calculated from low dose dynamic volume perfusion CT datasets in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer.
Wang X; Henzler T; Gawlitza J; Diehl S; Wilhelm T; Schoenberg SO; Jin ZY; Xue HD; Smakic A
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Nov; 85(11):2104-2110. PubMed ID: 27776665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abdominal Attenuation Values on Virtual and True Unenhanced Images Obtained With Third-Generation Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT.
Durieux P; Gevenois PA; Muylem AV; Howarth N; Keyzer C
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1042-1058. PubMed ID: 29528711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bowel Peristalsis Artifact on Dual-Energy CT: In Vitro Study on the Influence of Different Dual-Energy CT Platforms and Enteric Contrast Agents.
Obmann MM; Sun Y; An C; Ohliger MA; Wang ZJ; Yeh BM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Feb; 218(2):290-299. PubMed ID: 34406059
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of rigid and deformable motion correction algorithms using dual-energy CT images in view of application to CT perfusion measurements in abdominal organs affected by breathing motion.
Skornitzke S; Fritz F; Klauss M; Pahn G; Hansen J; Hirsch J; Grenacher L; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Br J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 88(1046):20140683. PubMed ID: 25465353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dual-energy CT angiography of the lungs: comparison of test bolus and bolus tracking techniques for the determination of scan delay.
Henzler T; Meyer M; Reichert M; Krissak R; Nance JW; Haneder S; Schoenberg SO; Fink C
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jan; 81(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 20621430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
