507 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29446863)
1. Conservation value of low-productivity forests measured as the amount and diversity of dead wood and saproxylic beetles.
Hämäläinen A; Strengbom J; Ranius T
Ecol Appl; 2018 Jun; 28(4):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 29446863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lower alpha, higher beta, and similar gamma diversity of saproxylic beetles in unmanaged compared to managed Norway spruce stands.
Gran O
PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271092. PubMed ID: 35802717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity.
Stenbacka F; Hjältén J; Hilszczański J; Dynesius M
Ecol Appl; 2010 Dec; 20(8):2310-21. PubMed ID: 21265460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Current near-to-nature forest management effects on functional trait composition of saproxylic beetles in beech forests.
Gossner MM; Lachat T; Brunet J; Isacsson G; Bouget C; Brustel H; Brandl R; Weisser WW; Müller J
Conserv Biol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 23432190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Potential implications of shortened rotation length for forest birds, bryophytes, lichens and vascular plants: An example from southern Swedish production forests.
Petersson L; Lariviere D; Holmström E; Lindbladh M; Felton A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(12):e0289835. PubMed ID: 38100411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Micro and macro-habitat associations in saproxylic beetles: implications for biodiversity management.
Hjältén J; Stenbacka F; Pettersson RB; Gibb H; Johansson T; Danell K; Ball JP; Hilszczański J
PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e41100. PubMed ID: 22848432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trait-environment interactions of saproxylic beetles as a guide to biodiversity conservation strategies.
Bergmark P; Hjältén J; Svensson J; Neumann W; Hekkala AM
J Environ Manage; 2024 Jun; 360():121080. PubMed ID: 38733839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Responses of arthropods to large-scale manipulations of dead wood in loblolly pine stands of the southeastern United States.
Ulyshen MD; Hanula JL
Environ Entomol; 2009 Aug; 38(4):1005-12. PubMed ID: 19689878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of landscape design of forest reserves on Saproxylic beetle diversity.
Bouget C; Parmain G
Conserv Biol; 2016 Feb; 30(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 26084716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Species diversity patterns in managed Scots pine stands in ancient forest sites.
Stefańska-Krzaczek E; Staniaszek-Kik M; Szczepańska K; Szymura TH
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219620. PubMed ID: 31295314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Uneven-aged silviculture can enhance within stand heterogeneity and beetle diversity.
Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Work T
J Environ Manage; 2018 Jan; 205():1-8. PubMed ID: 28961435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Forest management strategy affects saproxylic beetle assemblages: A comparison of even and uneven-aged silviculture using direct and indirect sampling.
Joelsson K; Hjältén J; Gibb H
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194905. PubMed ID: 29634728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increasing the amount of dead wood by creation of high stumps has limited value for lichen diversity.
Hämäläinen A; Ranius T; Strengbom J
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111646. PubMed ID: 33213989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An experimental test of the habitat-amount hypothesis for saproxylic beetles in a forested region.
Seibold S; Bässler C; Brandl R; Fahrig L; Förster B; Heurich M; Hothorn T; Scheipl F; Thorn S; Müller J
Ecology; 2017 Jun; 98(6):1613-1622. PubMed ID: 28317111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diversity of forest structures important for biodiversity is determined by the combined effects of productivity, stand age, and management.
Hämäläinen A; Runnel K; Ranius T; Strengbom J
Ambio; 2024 May; 53(5):718-729. PubMed ID: 38165548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial occurrence of a habitat-tracking saproxylic beetle inhabiting a managed forest landscape.
Schroeder LM; Ranius T; Ekbom B; Larsson S
Ecol Appl; 2007 Apr; 17(3):900-9. PubMed ID: 17494405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Burning of logged sites to protect beetles in managed boreal forests.
Toivanen T; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1562-72. PubMed ID: 18173480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Increase in dead wood, large living trees and tree diversity, yet decrease in understory vegetation cover: The effect of three decades of biodiversity-oriented forest policy in Swedish forests.
Kyaschenko J; Strengbom J; Felton A; Aakala T; Staland H; Ranius T
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114993. PubMed ID: 35413650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of extinction risk of saproxylic beetles with ecological degradation of forests in Europe.
Seibold S; Brandl R; Buse J; Hothorn T; Schmidl J; Thorn S; Müller J
Conserv Biol; 2015 Apr; 29(2):382-90. PubMed ID: 25429849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests?
Parmain G; Bouget C; Müller J; Horak J; Gossner MM; Lachat T; Isacsson G
Bull Entomol Res; 2015 Feb; 105(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 25434278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
